Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications

An International  Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access Journal

P-ISSN: 0974-6455 E-ISSN: 2321-4007

Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications

An Open Access International Journal

Gaurav Mishra1, Tripti Srivastava2, Rajasbala Dhande1,
Rohan Singh1 and Prerna Patwa1

1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,
Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (M), Wardha.

2Department of Physiology,Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical
College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (M), Wardha

Article Publishing History

Received: 29/03/2021

Accepted After Revision: 26/05/2021

ABSTRACT:

There is not much significant work in regard to utilization of evaluation as modality either of ‘Academic programmes&‘Product’.Literature search has revealed that publications on said count are rare. As suchpresent study is for availing modality of evaluation for Postgraduate ‘Academic Programme’ of Doctor of Medicine(MD) Radiodiagnosis and Diploma in Medical Radiodiagnosis (DMRD) programme in terms of operational processes with regards to evaluation of process of education programme using Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) parameters in accordance with Development Assessment Committee of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. To evaluate process for educational programme of MD and Diploma in DMRDin Department of Radiodiagnosis of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (deemed to be university), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardhaintermsoftheir Relevance, Efficiency, Effectiveness vide DANIDAE valuation criteria. This will be a Prospective descriptive study conducted for a Period of 6 months. Which will employ a standard curriculum questionnaire forascertaining ‘Relevance, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainability’ vide DANIDAguidelines to evaluate MDand DMRD educational programmes will be given to participating learners and members of teaching staff Participants (n=30, 19 learners, 11 faculty) will be divided into three groups, namely Group-1(Neutral Opinion), Group-2(Agreeing and Strongly Agreeing Opinion) and Group-3 (Disagreeing and Strongly Disagreeingopinion) and ratetheirsatisfaction level on rating scale of 10. Deciphering Relevance, Efficacy, Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainabilityof MD Radio diagnosis and DMR Deducation programme as against fulfilment of ‘set out objectives’ through ‘assessment of level of satisfaction. Responses in respect of relevant parameters will deliver level ofRelevance,Efficacy, Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainability in both academic courses.

KEYWORDS:

Radiodiagnosis, Programme Evaluation, MD, DMRD.

Download this article as:

Copy the following to cite this article:


Copy the following to cite this URL: