Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications

An International  Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access Journal

P-ISSN: 0974-6455 E-ISSN: 2321-4007

Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications

An Open Access International Journal

Baleegh A Alkadasi*1, Nasser M Al Ahmari2, Mokhtar A AL-dumaini3, Nashwan A Noman4, Adel A Aladimi5 and Mohammed M Al Moaleem6

1Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, IBB University, IBB, Yemen

2Prosthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

3Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, IBB University, IBB, Yemen

4Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen

5Department of conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, IBB University, IBB, Yemen

6Prosthetic Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

Article Publishing History

Received: 11/04/2020

Accepted After Revision: 28/05/2020

ABSTRACT:

The objective of the present study was to investigate the reasons of the permanent tooth extraction and its relationship with age and gender, for which  662 participants, divided into five age groups 14–23, 24–33, 34–43, 44–53, and ≤54-years-old were studied. Oral and radiographic examinations were done for each participant. Causes of tooth loss, age group, gender, Khat chewing, Shammah use, smoking, teeth brushing and Miswak using were recorded. The data were statically analyzed with SPSS program using Chi-square tests. The p value ≤ 0.050 were considered statistically significant.  From the total number of the participants 335(50.6%) were males. The highest age group was in the 14–23 age-group (43.1%). Dental caries was represented by (49.53), while the periodontal disease was (23.3%). The failure of root canal treatment, orthodontic and other causes were (3.6%, 11.3%, 11.3%), respectively. There were significant differences between genders and different age groups in relation to causes of tooth extraction.

KEYWORDS:

Extractions, permanent teeth, dental caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss.

Download this article as:

Copy the following to cite this article:

Alkadasi B. A, Al-Ahmari N. M, AL-dumaini M. A, Noman N. A, A-Aladimi A, Al-Moaleem M. M. Etiology and Prevalence of Permanent Tooth Extraction Among Group of Yemeni Population. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2020;13(2).


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Alkadasi B. A, Al-Ahmari N. M, AL-dumaini M. A, Noman N. A, A-Aladimi A, Al-Moaleem M. M. Etiology and Prevalence of Permanent Tooth Extraction Among Group of Yemeni Population. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2020;13(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/2zrxNNO

Copyright © Alkadasi et al., This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) https://creativecommns.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium, provide the original author and source are credited.

 


INTRODUCTION

Many surveys on the causes of tooth loss in different countries have been conducted and have concluded several controversies regarding whether periodontal and /or dental caries diseases are the main reasons for tooth loss. In-addition, failure of previous endodontic treatments, orthodontic causes and other reasons such as trauma, iatrogenic or preapical pathosis and combinations of these, have been cited as some of the common reasons for extraction of teeth in the available literatures (Richards et al. 2005, Reich and Hiller 1993). Khat-chewing habit in Taiz, Republic of Yemen is widely spread and practiced by most of the population (Al-Sharabi  2011). Khat is fresh leaves of the shrub Catha edulis, which are chewed like tobacco in the lower buccal pouch unilaterally (left or right) in a bolus form for several hours per day (Hattab and Al-Abdulla 2011, Imran and Murad 2009). Due to  continuous khat contact with mucosa and gingiva by daily khat chewing, there is  an increase in periodontal problems with membrane  attachment loss, being the  the most common  causes of khat chewing, (Hassan etal. 2007, Al Moaleem 2017,  Ali et al., 2018, Noman et al. 2019 Salman et al., 2019).

It is clear from a number of earlier  studies that  dental caries is a main cause of tooth loss among young age and in both gender as well as elder groups) Kashif et al.2014, Montandon et al.2012 (Anyanechi  and Chukwuneke 2012 Noman et al. 2019, but other cross-sectional studies  have concluded  that both periodontal diseases and caries are the main reasons of permeant teeth extractions in males and females (Gossadi et al. 2015, Murray et al.1996, Aderinokun and Dosumu 1997), even though a quite number of studies mentioned that teeth loss were totally related to periodontitis (Ali et al. 2018, Murray et al.1996). Studies pointed to some reasons such as orthodontic causes (Noman et al. 2019, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Chukwuneke 2012, Yousaf et al. 2012, Al-Shammari et al. 2006, Baqain et al., 2007), while others said it is related to root canal failures (Al Ameer and Awad 2017, Chukwuneke 2012, Kashif et al.2014 , Al-Shammari et al. 2006), or other causes were observed to be the causes of tooth loss (Al Ameer and Awad 2017, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Chukwuneke 2012, Kashif et al.2014 , Al-Shammari et al. 2006, Baqain et al., 2007, Aderinokun and Dosumu 1997). Table 1; shows summary of some studies in different countries regarding the causes of tooth loss.

Table 1. Summary of some studies in different countries regarding the causes of tooth extractions

Researcher Names/ Year of the Study Country Sample Size Causes and Percentages Gender /  Significant Highest % in age group / Significant
CURRENT STUDY Taiz, Republic of Yemen 662 Caries (49.53), P A (23.3%), Orthodontic (11.3%),

Failure RCT (3.6%), Others (11.3%)

Female (50.6%)

Male (49.4%)/

Significant

14-23

Dental caries was the most common cause in (14-23 and 24-33). PD ↑ gradually from (34-43) to ≥ 54-year-olds.

Salman et al.2019 Pakistan 520 Caries (50.53), P A (38.4%), Orthodontic (0.0%), Failure RCT (0.3%), Others (10.8%) Female (53%)

Male (47%)/

Significant

45-54

Most lost their teeth due to caries, followed PD

Shah et al. 2019 Gujarat, India 869 Caries (77.3), P A (16.6%), Orthodontic (0.5%), Failure RCT (5.0%), Others (0.6%) Female (50.4%)

Male (49.6%)/

Non-significant

44-45 & 55-64

Caries (53.7%), in patients (15-44 years group).

P D 81.4% of (45-84 years group).

Ali et al.2018 Aden, Yemen 450 P D (51.1%),

Caries (33.1%),

Other & Orthodontic (15.8%)

Male (72.2%)

Female (27.8%)

Young patient caries

P D ↑with age

Al Ameer & Awad. 2017 Al- Madinah, KSA 1589 Caries (63.4%), P D (14.6%)

Failed root canal (2.7%),

Orthodontic (1.3%),

Trauma (0.2%)

Females (57.6%),

Male (42.3%) /Significant

Over 40 (40.8%)

Female all age groups

Al Moaleem et al.

2016

Jazan, KSA 579 P D (37.1%), Caries (30.1%)

Trauma (12.1%)

Over 40 (50-59) caries

P D ↑50 (70%)

Kaira et al. 2016 India 1506 Caries (43.95%),

P D (31.34%),

Orthodontic (10.4%),

Failure RCT (0.45%),

Trauma (0.29%)

Females (55.9%),

Male (44%)

(51-70),  then (11-20)
Sahibzada et al. 2016 Turkey 8355 Caries (85.3%),  P D (7.6%)

Orthodontic (2%),

Failure RCT (1%), Trauma (1%)

Females (59.1%)

Male (40.9%)/ Significant

Over 50 years
Al-Shammari et al. 2015 Kuwait 2783 Caries (43.7%)

P D (37.4%)

Orthodontics (4.3%).

Failed RCT (2.7%)

Female (50.2%)

Male (49.8%)  / Significant

31 – 40 (29.9%)

Caries ↓ in young patients (60.7%; 20-29)

P D (63%; 30-50)

Chrysanthakopulos

2015

Greek 1231 P D (34.4%)

Caries (32.2%)

Others (33.4%)

P D ↑with age
Gossadi et al. 2015 Jazan, KSA 691 Caries (33.3%), P D (31%)

Orthodontic (17.1%)

Female (28.5%)

Male (25.9%) /

Non-significant

Young  (20-29) caries

P D ↑ 40 years

Lee et al 2015 Taiwan 4811 Caries (55.3%); all age group

P D ↑ 35 years

Female Over 60 years
Kashif et al. 2014 Pakistan 6251 Caries (51.8%), P D (19.2%),

Orthodontics (2.9%),

Failed RCT (2.8%)

Female (56.7%),

Male (43.3)

Age 50 years
Alesia & Khalil 2013 Riyadh, KSA 1554 Caries (50.2%)

Orthodontics (18.2%)

P D (8.2%)

Female (55.5%)

Male (44.5%)

10-30
Jafarian & Etebarian. 2013 Iran 1,382 Caries (51%),

P D (14.4%),

Orthodontic (7.2%)

Female (51.3%)

Male (47.8%) /

Significant

(41-60)

Caries ↑20, P D ↑40 years. Male (55.3%), Female (43.9%)/ Significant

Anyanechi & Chukwuneke 2012 Eastern Nigeria 3998 Caries (55.2%) Females (62.3%)

Males (37.7%)

(11- 30) Both males & females
Haseeb et al. 2012 Pakistan 1178 Caries (63.1%), P D (26.2%),

Failure RCT (4.6%),

Trauma (3.2%)

Male (59.6%), Females (40.4%) Over 51-80 years
Montandon et al.  2012 Brazil 437 Caries 45 years

P D ↑ with 45-82

35-65  years
Yousaf et al. 2012 Pakistan 1500 Caries (41.2%), P D (34.8%),

Orthodontic (4.3%),

Others (3.2%)

Male (70%)

Female (30%)

Over 40 years
Nasreen & Haq 2011 Bangladesh 110 Caries (68.2%),

P D (12.7%),

Orthodontic (4.5%)

Female (53.6%)

Male (46.4%)

(20-39)
Preethanath, 2010 Al Baha, KSA 820 Caries

P D

Female (19.71%)

Male (12.57%)/

Non-significant

Young (20-29) caries

P D ↑ with age

Anand & Kuriakose 2009 India 1791 Caries (39.5%), P D (28.4%),

Orthodontic (19.4%),

Others (2.5%)

Males (53%) Females (47%)/ Significant (55-64), (15-24)
Baqain et al. 2007 Jordan 2435 Caries (63.8%), P D (22.9%),

Orthodontics (2.4%),

Trauma (2.4%)

Male/

Significant

21 – 30 years/ Significant

P D ↑40

Orthodontic / Significant

Sayegh et al. 2004 Jordan 2200 Caries (46.9%), P D (18%)

Orthodontics (4%),

Trauma (0.7%)

≤ 40 years of age (Caries),  ↑40-year-old group (P D)
Aderinokun & Dousmu  1997 Nigeria 1301 P D (61.9%)

Caries (34.1%)

Trauma (4.0%)

Females (51.5%) Male (49.5)/

Non-Significant

(21-31) caries

P D ↑ 45 years

Murray et al. 1996 Canada 6143 Caries

Orthodontic  in chilled hood

All age

P D ↑ 40 years

PD; periodontal diseases      RCT; root canal treatments       Increase; ↑       Decrease; ↓     Significant; *             Non-Significant #

Tooth loss may affect communication, as well as produces some masticatory difficulties and could end in poor facial aesthetic outcome. In-addition, it is an indicator of the overall general oral health of any population (Brodeur et al.1996, Stratton and Wiebelt 1988). Thus the aim of this study was to investigate the causes of tooth loss and the effect of several social habits that causes tooth loss its relationship with age, and gender.

MATERIAL AND METHODS 

Study design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among subjects seeking dental extractions and oral treatments at different clinics in Taiz city, Republic of Yemen. The current study was conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, and after a signed of the ethical approval of the study.

Study participants, data collections and questioner:The data collections were carried out during the period from February 2018 to March 2019 for participants who were requiring teeth extraction. A total of 662 participants (335; males and 327; females) were involved in the present study. The participants were selected through non-probability convenience sampling. The data were collected by general practitioners dentists after a short period of training using a pre-designed questionnaire. After a written consent had been signed by each participant, the clinical and radiographic examinations of dental arches were performed on a dental chair using the regular examination kit. The questioner form was simple and consisted of a single page. The chartings were done to record the causes of tooth loss in relation to participant’s gender and age.

Participants grouping and social habits: Khat chewing, Shammah using, Miswake, toothbrushes, and smoking were recorded. The questions of the sides of khat chewing and Shammah use were recorded, also the chewing durations were registered as daily/week/month. Patients of both genders, above the age of 14 years and without any systemic diseases, were involved in the current study. All data related to the causes of teeth loss were recorded and collected in a self-designed preform. According to the age, the selected subjects were divided into five groups, 14–23, 24-33, 34-43, 44-53, and ≥54-years-old, respectively.

Classification of causes and criteria recording:With some modification all the data classifying the causes of missing teeth were recorded using the criteria mentioned by Mc Caul LK et al. 2001 and Cahen PM et al.1985 . The criteria were: Dental Caries (A tooth was concerned as requiring extraction due to dental caries when caries had destroyed the crown so that it cannot be restored, if there were carious exposure of the pulp or a septic roots. Periodontal Disease (extraction due to periodontal disease if it tended to satisfy the score criteria of Russell’s PI index (Russell, 1956), namely the presence of considerable mobility according to the Miller Mobility Index Miller, 1956). Orthodontic Treatment Causes (whenever a tooth is removed under the request from the orthodontist); Other Causes which included trauma (when a non-carious associated trauma to the tooth is the reason for its extraction); or iatrogenic (due to incorrect treatments done in dental clinics).

Statistical analysis: All the data were recorded then summarized as frequencies and percentages, after that analyzed descriptively using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.1 SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). An association and comparison with different variables were performed using the Chi-square test. The p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS  AND DISCUSSION

From table 2; a 662 participant were included in this study, (335; 50.6% males and 327; 49.4% females). The highest age group was in the 14–23 age group (285; 43.1%), followed by 198 (29.9%) among the 24–33 age group, while the lowest participants were in the age group with ≥ 54 and represented (16, 2.4%). The number and percentage of khat chewer participants were 377 (56.9%), with 287 (43.4%) were daily chewed khat. The participant’s number with Shammah user were 71; 10.7% only. But, the highest number and percentage regarding the sides for khat chewing and Shammah using were the left side in both parameters (260 [39.3%] and 31 [4.7%], respectively). Finally the number and percentages of the participants using toothbrush, Miswak and smoking were (308; 46.5%, 142; 21.5%, 421; 63.6%), respectively.

Table 2. Descriptive of participants in relation to gender and social habits

Gender and social habits
Parameter Gender Khat Chewers Frequency of Khat Chewing Khat Chewing Side Teeth Brushing Miswake Using Shammah Users Shammah Using Side Smoking
Male Female Yes No Daily Weekly Monthly Left Right Yes No Yes No Yes No Right Left Yes No
Number 335 327 377 285 287 42 48 260 117 308 354 142 520 71 591 31 40 421 241
Percentage 50.6 49.4 56.9 43.1 43.4 6.3 7.3 39.3 17.7 46.5 53.5 21.5 78.5 10.7 89.3 4.7 6.0 63.6 36.4

The relation and association between the frequency and percentages among gender in the khat chewing and Shammah using (side or frequency) parameters were significant with p value 0.000. However, we did not detect an association between participants from both gender and teeth brushing, Miswak using and smoking and the results of these parameters were not significant with p values 0.102, 0.257, and 0.053, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3. Frequency and percentages of the study variables in relation to gender

Gender Male

N     %

Female

N    %

Total

N    %

P value
Khat Chewers 0.000*
Yes   N (%) 266 (74.4) 111 (39.9) 377 (56.9)
No    N (%) 69 (20.6) 216 (66.1) 285 (43.1)
Frequency of Khat Chewing 0.000*
Daily 199 (59.4) 88 (26.9) 287 (43.3)
weekly 32 (9.6) 10 (3.1) 42 (6.3)
Monthly 29 (8.7) 19 (5.8) 48 (7.3)
No 75 (22.4) 210 (64.2) 285 (43.1)
khat Chewing Side 0.000*
Left 206 (61.5) 204 (62.3) 410 (61.9)
Right 73 (21.8) 44 (13.5) 117 (17.7)
No 56 (16.7) 79 (24.2) 135 (20.4)
Teeth Brushing 0.102
 Yes 145 (43.3) 163 (49.8) 308 (46.5)
No 190 (56.7) 164 (50.2) 354 (53.5)
Miswake Using 0.257
Yes 78 (23.3) 64 (19.6) 142 (21.5)
No 257 (76.7) 263 (80.4) 520 (78.5)
Shammah Users 0.000*
Yes 60 (17.9) 11 (3.4) 71 (10.7)
No 275 (82.1) 316 (96.6) 591 (89.3)
Shammah Using Side 0.000*
Left 33 (9.9) 7 (2.1) 40 (6.0)
Right 27 (8.1) 4 (1.2) 31 (4.7)
No 275 (82.0) 316 (96.6) 591 (89.3)
Smoking 0.053
Yes 201 (60.0) 220 (67.3) 421 (63.6)
No 134 (40.0) 107 (32.7) 241 (36.4)

*Statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05 from Chi-Square tests
Table 4 shows the relation between the different age groups and the resons of tooth loss. Dental caries was the most common cause of teeth loss in the young age groups (14-23 and 24-33 years; 150 [52.6%] and 126 [63.6%] respectively). The rate of periodontal disease increased gradually from the middle age group 34-43 (45.3%), and reached 71% among ≥ 54-year-olds. Among the 14–23-year-olds, all extractions of permanent teeth were for orthodontic causes. The failure of RCT was recorded in the middle and elder age groups. All the previous results were significant differences with p values < 0.000 except in the cause of failures in root canal treatment which was not significantly difference.

Comparing the causes of tooth loss among gender, among the females participants the number and percentages of tooth loss were more due to dental caries and orthodontic causes (231; 70.6% and 56; 17.1%), while in males it was higher among the periodontal diseases participants (96; 28.7%), and all the parameters were significant differences P < 0.001. The other causes of tooth loss were more among males and recorded 54 (16.1%). All the variables were significantly differences among gender except in the failure of root canal treatment cause (Table 5).

Table 4. Association between different age groups and cause of tooth loss

Cause/ Age Group 14-23

N      %

24-33

N     %

34-43

N    %

44-53

N   %

≥ 54

N   %

Total

N   %

P value
Dental Caries 0.000*
Yes 150 (52.6) 126 (63.6) 30 (28.3) 16 (28.1) 6 (42.9) 328 (49.5)
No 135 (47.4) 72 (36.4) 76 (71.7) 41 (71.9) 10 (57.1) 334 (50.5)
Periodontal Disease 0.000*
Yes 17 (6.0) 50 (25.3) 48 (45.3) 29 (50.9) 10 (71.4) 154 (23.3)
No 268 (94.0) 148 (74.7) 58 (54.7) 28 (49.1) 6 (28.6) 508 (76.7)
Failure of Root Canal Treatment 0.060
Yes 9 (3.2) 13 (6.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.5) 0 (0.0) 24 (3.6)
No 276 (96.8) 185 (93.4) 106 (100) 55 (96.5) 16 (100) 638 (96.4)
Orthodontic Cause 0.000*
Yes 65 (22.8) 9 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) 0 (0.0) 75 (11.3)
No 220 (77.2) 189 (95.5) 106 (100) 56 (98.2) 16 (100) 587 (88.7)
Other Causes 0.000*
Yes 21 (7.4) 19 (9.6) 19 (17.9) 11 (19.3) 5 (21.4) 75 (11.3)
No 264 (92.6) 179 (90.4) 87 (82.1) 46 (80.7) 11 (78.6) 587 (88.7)

The participants recruited in the current study were carried out at different private clinics in Taiz city. The objectives of this study were to investigate the reasons of the permanent tooth extraction and its relationship with age and gender. World Health Organization (WHO) in its report pointed a good oral health as an indicator of overall good health and recommended many steps in order to improve oral health globally (The World health Report 2002-2003).

It is important to include a good number from both genders in a prevalence study. In the current study the participant’s males to females percentages (table 1) were near to each other 50.6% -49.4%, this percentages were close to numbers mentioned by other studies conducted in Yemen (Taiz), India, Iran and Nigeria(Noman et al. 2019, Shah et al.2019, Jafarian and Etebarian 2013, Aderinokun and Dosumu 1997). In other hand this percentage were less than that obtained in other worldwide studies as in Pakistan (Salman et al. 2019, Kashif et al.2014, Yousaf et al. 2012), in Yemen (Aden), in Saudi Arabia cities (Riyadh, Al-Madinah, Jazan), in Bangladesh, in Nigeria, in Turkey, in India (Ali et al. 2018,Al Ameer and Awad 2017, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Chukwuneke 2012, Gossadi et al.2015, Sahibzada et al. 2016, Kaira et al. 2016). These differences may relate to the selected place from where the samples were collected.

From the demographic data of this study, the highest participant numbers were among the 14-23 years-age-group (43.1%), followed by the 24-33 years-age-group (29.9), those age-groups were closed to the same age-groups registered by studies in Asia (Noman et al. 2019, Anyanechi  and Chukwuneke 2012, Montandon et al.2012, Gossadi et al.2015, Baqain et al.2007 Aderinokun and Dosumu 1997), but this was in contrast with the results of other international studies (Salman et al. 2019, Shah et al.2019, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Jafarian , Etebarian 2013, Kashif et al.2014, Montandon et al.2012, Kaira et al. 2016 (Salman et al.,  2019).

The major cause of tooth extraction among participants from Taiz city, Republic of Yemen was dental caries in the younger age group 14–23 and 24–33 and it is significantly differences. In-addition the periodontal disease was gradually increased from the middle to elder age groups 34 – over 54. These results coincided with results found in Yemen (Noman et al. 2019, Ali et al. 2018), in Saudi Arabia (Alesia and Khalil 2013, Gossadi et al.2015, Preethanath2010), in Iran (Jafarian and Etebarian 2013), in Jordon (Baqain et al.2007). Other results concluded that periodontal diseases are the common cause of tooth loss as obtained by (Ali et al. 2018) in India, (Al Moaleem et al. 2016)in Saudi Arabia, (Chrysanthakopoulos 2011) in Greek and in Nigeria (Aderinokun and Dosumu  1997).

Dental caries is the most oral diseases leads to extraction of the permanent teeth. From this prospective study, we found that nearly half of the teeth in the all age-groups (49.5%) were extracted due to dental caries and its sequelae (table-4). This is in parallel with the finding of other research in different countries (Noman et al. 2019, Salman et al. 2019, Alesia and Khalil 2013, Jafarian and Etebarian 2013, Kashif et al.2014, Sayegh et al. 2004). In-addition extraction of teeth due to dental caries diseases were more than 50% in the researchers conducted in other countries(Shah et al.2019, Al Ameer and Awad 2017, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Chukwuneke 2012, Haseeb et al. 2012, Lee et al.2015, Baqain et al.2007, Sahibzada et al. 2016), but it does not reach 40% in a other group of studies (Ali et al. 2018, Anand and Kuriakose 2009, Yousaf et al. 2012, Gossadi et al.2015, Al Moaleem et al. 2016, Al-Shammari et al.2006, Chrysanthakopoulos 2011, Kaira et al.2016, Aderinokun and Dosumu 1997 ) as showed in table 1. This can be explained by the type of social habits regarding type of foods.

From table 4 and 5 in the present study, the results the cause of tooth loss ‘’failures of root canal treatments’’ were not significantly differences among the different age groups or gender. This is in association with previous results mentioned by(Noman et al. 2019, Salman et al. 2019, Al Ameer and Awad 2017, Kashif et al.2014, Al-Shammari et al. 2006, Sahibzada et al. 2016, Kaira et al.2016). The frequency of the same factor registered near to or more than 5% in other research(Ali et al. 2018, Haseeb et al.2012, Yousaf et al. 2012). Among the orthodontic cause of tooth extraction our results were agreed with that mentioned those types of extraction were totally related to the younger age groups (Noman et al. 2019, Salman et al. 2019, Nasreen and Haq 2011, Jafarian and Etebarian 2013, Kashif et al.2014, Yousaf et al.2012, Al-Shammari  et al.2006, Baqain et al.2007, Sahibzada et al.2016, Murray et al.1996), but it was less 2% in (Salman et al. 2019, Al Ameer and Awad 2017 ) , and reach near to 20% in a studies (Salman et al. 2019, Ali et al. 2018, Alesia and Khalil 2013, Anand and Kuriakose 2009, Haseeb et al. 2012). This wide range of differences can be related to many factors such as the socioeconomic status of the patient, governmental services of such type of treatments and the education level of their parents as well as educational level.

One of the limitation of this study is its designed by researchers but, the data were collected by many general dental practitioners after a demonstration for participant examination and recording the clinical and radiographically findings on the examination sheet. On the other hand the strength of this study is its participants selections were collected from different areas of Taiz city, Republic of Yemen.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitation of this cross-sectional study the following conclusions can be drawn: The major reason of tooth loss among participants from Taiz city, Republic of Yemen was dental caries and in the younger age group 14–23 and 24–33. Periodontal disease was gradually increased from the middle to elder age groups 34 – over 54.  There were significant differences between genders and different age groups in relation to causes of tooth extractions.

Conflict of interest: None

REFERENCES

Aderinokun GA, Dosumu OO.(1997) Causes of tooth mortality in a Nigerian Urban Centre. Odontostomatol Trop 79:68.

Ainamo J, Sarkki L, Kuhalampi Ml, Palolampi L, Piirto O. (1985)The frequency of periodontal extractions in Finland. Comm Dent Heath 1: 165-72.

Al Ameer HM, Awad S.(2017) Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extraction in Al-Madinah Al- Munawarah.  JAMMR  24(7): 1-6.

Al Moaleem MM, Somaili DA, Ageeli TA, Namis SM, Mobarki AH, Mohamed MS, et al (2016). Pattern of partial edentulism and its relation to age, gender, causes of teeth loss in Jazan population. Ame J Heal Rese. 4:121-26.

Al Moaleem MM.(2017) Patterns of Partial Edentulism and its Relation to Khat Chewing in Jazan Population – A Survey Study. J Clin Diag Research  11(3): ZC55-ZC59.

Alesia K, Khalil H.(2013) Reasons for and patterns relating to the extraction of permanent teeth in a subset of the Saudi population. Clin, Cosme Investig Dent 2013; 5: 51-56.

Ali HT, Saleh HO, Noman AF, Moqbel AS, Allah AT. (2018) Periodontal indications for tooth extraction in the main general teaching hospital, Aden, Yemen: A prospective study. SRM J Res Dent Sci  9: 1-5.

Al-Shammari KF, Al-Ansari JM, Abu Al-Melh M, Al-Khabbaz AK.(2006) Reasons for Tooth Extraction in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 15: 417–422.

Al-Sharabi AKA.(2011) Conditions of oral mucosa due to takhzeen al-qat. Yeme J Med Scie 5:1–6.

Anand PS, Kuriakose S.(2012) Causes and Patterns of Loss of Permanent Teeth among Patients Attending a Dental Teaching Institution in South India. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (5): 1-11.

Anyanechi  C, Chukwuneke F. Survey of the Reasons for Dental Extraction in Eastern Nigeria. Jul-Dec; 2(2): 129–133.

Baqain ZHKhraisat ASawair FGhanam SShaini FJRajab LD. (2007) Dental extraction for patients presenting at oral surgery student clinic. Compend Contin Educ Dent.  28(3):146-50.

Brodeur JM, Benigeri M, Naccache H, Oliver M, Payette M.(1996) Trend in the Level of Education in Quebec Between 1980-1993. J Can Dent Assoc.  62:159-60.

Cahen PM, Frank RM, Turlot C. (1985) A survey of the reasons for dental extractions in France,J Dent Rese 64(8): 1087–1093.

Chestnutt IG, Binnie VI, Taylor MM.(2000) Reasons for tooth extraction in Scotland. J Dent 28: 295–297.

Chrysanthakopoulos NA. (2011) Periodontal Reasons for Tooth Extraction in a Group of Greek Army Personnel. JODDD  5: 56-60.

Gossadi YI, Al Moaleem MM et al.(2015) Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extraction In Jizan Region Of Saudi Arabia. IOSR-JDMS  14: 86-89.

Haseeb M, Ali K, Munir MF.(2012) Causes of tooth extraction at a tertiary care centre in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 62(8); 812-15.

Hassan NAGM, Gunaid AA, Murray-Lyon IM.(2007)  Khat (Catha edulis): health aspects of khat chewing. East Mediter Health J  13:15–24.

Hattab NF, Al-Abdulla A.(2011)  Effect of Khat chewing on general and oral health. J Oral Medicine 5:33–35.

Imran AG, Murad AH.(2009)  The effect of khat chewing on periodontal tissues and buccal mucosa membrane. Dama Univ Medi Scie J 25:493–504.

Jafarian M, Etebarian A.(2013)  Reasons for Extraction of Permanent Teeth in General Dental Practices in Tehran, Iran.  Med Princ Pract 22: 239–44.

Kaira LS, Dabral E, Sharma R, Sharma M, Kumar DRV.(2016) Reasons for Permanent Teeth Extraction in Srinagar District of Uttrakhand. OHDM 15(4): 247- 51.

Kashif M, Mehmood K, Ayub T, Aslam M.(2014)  Reasons and Patterns of Tooth Extraction in a Tertiary Care Hospital- A Cross Sectional Prospective Survey. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci. 13(03):125-9.

Lee C-Y, Chang Y-Y,  Shieh T-Y.(2015)  Reasons for Permanent Tooth Extractions in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific J Public Health  27(2): NP2352.

Mc Caul LK, Jenkins WM, Kay EJ. (2001) The reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Scotland: a 15-year follow-up study. Br Dent J  190: 658–62.

Montandon AB, Zuza EP, Corrde Toledo BE. (2012) Prevalence and Reasons for Tooth Loss in a Sample from a Dental Clinic in Brazil. Inte J Den Article ID 719750, 5 pages.

Murray H, Locker D, Kay EJ. (1996) Patterns of and reasons for tooth extractions in general dental practice in Ontario, Canada. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24:196–200.

Nasreen T, Haq M E.(2011) Factors of tooth extraction among adult patients attending in exodontia department of Dhaka Dental College and Hospital. Ban J Orthod Dentofac  Orthop 2: 7-10.

Noman NA, Aladimi AA, Alkadasi BA, Alraawi MA, Al-Iryani GM, Shaabi FI, Khalid A, Al Moaleem MM.(2019)  Social Habits and Other Risk Factors that Cause Tooth Loss: An Associative Study Conducted in Taiz Governorate, Yemen. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(4):428-433.

Preethanath RS. (2010) Reasons For Tooth Extraction In Urban And Rural Populations Of Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Oral & Dent J 30: 199-204.

Reich E, Hiller KA. (1993) Reasons for tooth extraction in the western states of Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol  21: 379–383.

Richards W, Ameen J, Coll AM, Higgs G. (2005) Reasons for tooth extraction in four general dental   practices in South Wales. Br Dent J 198: 275–278.

Sahibzada HA, MunirA, Siddiqi KM, Baig MZ.(2016)  Pattern and Causes of Tooth Extraction in Patients Reporting to a Teaching Dental Hospital. JIMDC 5(4): 172-6.

Salman SMA, Ahmed S, Bari YA, Ghory O, Farooq F, Younus M. (2019) Common Factors Leading to Tooth Extraction – A Cross Sectional Study in A Tertiary Care Hospital”. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences 3.8 (2019): 23-28.

Sayegh A, Hilow HBedi R.(2004)  Pattern of tooth loss in recipients of free dental treatment at the University Hospital of Amman, Jordan. J Oral Rehabil. Feb; 31(2):124-30.

Shah A, Faldu M, Chowdhury S.(2019)  Reasons for extractions of permanent teeth in western India: A prospective study. IJADS  5(1): 180-184.

Stratton RJ, Wiebelt FJ.(1988)  An atlas of removable partial denture design, Chicago Illinois. Quintessence Publishing Co. pp: 27-30.

WHO (2003) The World health Report. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Program. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000-2003; (Suppl 1):3-21.

Yousaf A, Mahmood S, Yousaf N, Bangash Ka, Manzoor MA(2012) . Reasons For Extractions In Patients Seen In Pak Field Hospital Level 3 Darfur, Sudan. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal  32 (3): 393-8.