1Department of Botany, St. John’s College, Anchal, Kollam
2Plant Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University College, Trivandrum, 695 034, Kerala, India
Article Publishing History
Accepted After Revision: 05/08/2016
Exploring the mechanism of desiccation tolerance is critical in order to unravel the position of ferns in tropical region of the earth. Desiccation in plants induces morphological deformities, ROSs formation, oxidation of protein, nucleic acids, peroxidation of cell membranes, antioxidants machinery and photosynthetic efficacy. The present study is planned to analyze the pigment and fluorescence responses of the forked fern – Dicranopteris Linearis (Burm.F.) Underw. against desiccation and rehydration stress with a view to select drought tolerant marker species. Fronds of the fern were subjected to various regimes of desiccation rehydration stress ((a) 2 (b) 4 (c) 6 (d) 8 and (e) 10 days). Initially chlorophyll a and b pigments were decreased (2nd day) followed by an increase indicating the physiological resurrection of the stressed plants during subsequent days of desiccation phase. Meanwhile, carotenoids showed a steady increase till 6th day followed by a decrease. The quantum yield potential of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was 0.61, 0.77, 0.79, 0.80 and 0.76 respectively, when subjected to 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 days of desiccation. The Fv/Fm ratio, Fm, Fv, Fo the potential parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence can be used in the early detection of desiccation stress in the fern. Further, the quantum yields (Fv/Fm), photosynthetic quenching and ERT and non-photochemical quenching were maintained remarkably in the fronds till the 8 d of desiccation stress. Further studies are warranted at molecular levels to unravel the mechanism of desiccation tolerant ability in the fern.
Chlorophyll Fluorescence; Chlorophyll; Carotenoids; Photosynthetic Efficacy
Kavitha C H, Murugan K. Photochemical Efficacy Analysis Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Dicranopteris Linearis in Response to Desiccation and Rehydration Stress. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2016;9(3).
Kavitha C H, Murugan K. Photochemical Efficacy Analysis Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Dicranopteris Linearis in Response to Desiccation and Rehydration Stress. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2016;9(3). Available from: https://bit.ly/31y62LV
Desiccation is the most alarming stress faced by plants. The loss of water in the tissues leads to the denaturation of essential biomolecules and subsequently, degeneration of cell organelles (Alpert, 2006). Animals actively avoid desiccation by movements, while plants are static and therefore subjected to water loss and recover back slowly during rehydration (Alpert, 2006). Resurrection plants such as Myrothamnus flabellifolius, Xerophyta viscose, and Sporobolus stapfianus were proven drought tolerant species (even up to 90% water loss) (Alpert, 2006). Adaptation to desiccation is based on the ability of the organism to equilibrate its internal water potential with the desiccating environment, and also their drastic ability to regain normal activities after rehydration (Alpert, 2000).
Compared to vascular plants (Vicre et al., 2004), the mechanisms involved in desiccation among lower plants like ferns is poorly understood. Most of the drought stress initiates the activation of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase (GR) etc. (Burritt et al., 2002) to counter balance desiccation-mediated oxidative stress. Similarly, many macro algae resist desiccation tolerance through the photosynthetic system including chloroplast (Zou and Gao, 2002a,b). Fucus vesiculosus was evaluated by molecular approaches to unravel the responses to desiccation via the genes encoding photosynthetic and ribosomal proteins (Pearson et al., 2010 Maghsoudi et al., 2015).
The photosystem II reaction center was critical in photosynthetic pathway against drought stress (Wen et al., 2005) i.e., desiccation stress reduces the photosynthetic electron transport activity and also the fluorescence of photosystem II (PSII). Inactivation of PSII leads to derailment of the water-splitting complex, disturbance of pigment protein complexes in thylakoids, which further influences regulation of energy transfer and finally, the photochemical reaction center of PSII was deactivated (Wise et al., 2004). Impact of plants exposed to desiccation stress was drastic but, its recovery was gradual or ceased due to the injury to PSII components (Sinsawat et al., 2004 and Kifah and Jaroslav, 2015).
The use of fluorescence parameters permit to analyze the reduction in electron transport disorder via the emission of heat in the form of IR radiation or by fluorescence. This technique is based on the light kinetics absorbed by antenna pigments and the excitation energy transferred to the reaction centers of photosystem I and II (Zhani et al., 2012).
Contreras-Porcia et al., (2011) analyzed the interrelationship between Fm and F0 in Porphyra columbina collected from the different intertidal regions. Generally, in the optimal conditions the proportion of radiant energy emitted as fluorescence is decreased. Meanwhile, during stressed conditions, the chlorophyll fluorescence will be altered (Kadir and Von Weihe 2007). So, in vivo fluorescence of chlorophyll provides an early sign of photosynthetic malfunction and can be used as marker to localize the possible sites of damage induced by stress within the cells. In this juncture, the present study is aimed to analyze the photosynthetic pigments and their efficiency in the fern against different duration of desiccation and rehydration.
Material And Methods
Quantification Of Photosynthetic Pigments
Photosynthetic pigments were estimated in 80% acetone extract. 1 g tissue was homogenized with 1.5 ml of 80% chilled acetone. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The aliquots were made up to 3 ml by using 80% acetone and the absorbance was read at 470, 648 and 664 nm spectrophotometrically against 80% acetone as blank. Total chlorophyll as well as chlorophyll a and b concentrations and carotenoids were calculated according to the protocol of Arnon (1949).
Chlorophyll fluorescence emission from the upper and lower surface of the leaves of the fern was measured by a modulated fluorometer (OS 500;Opti Sciences;Inc;Tyngsboro;Mass). Maximum fluorescence yield (Fm) was determined during saturating flash (3000 μmol m-2s-2). The actual fluorescence level (F) was monitored to ensure that it was stable. To obtain the maximal fluorescence yield under illumination (Fm), the leaf was exposed to a saturating flash during exposure to actinic light (210 μmol m-2s-1). To determine the minimal level of fluorescence during illumination (F0), the leaf was continuously illuminated with far-red light (730 nm) to rapidly reoxidize the PSII centers. All measurements were conducted at 25ºC (Demmig-Adams et al., 1996).
The minimal fluorescence level (F0) with all PSII reaction centers open and the maximal fluorescence level (Fm) with all PSII reaction centers closed were determined on dark-adapted leaves. Then the leaves were continuously illuminated with a white actinic light at an irradiance of 180 µmol m-2 s-1 to measure the steady-state value of fluorescence (Fs), which occurred at about 6 min after the initiation of white actinic light. The maximal fluorescence level in the light-adapted state (Fm’) was recorded after subjecting the leaf to a second saturating pulse at 8000 µmol m-2 s-1.
The minimal fluorescence level in the light-adapted state (F0) was determined by exposing the leaf to far-red light for 3s.Using both light and dark fluorescence data, the following parameters were calculated:
Fv (maximum variable chlorophyll fluorescence yield in a dark-adapted state) was calculated following Maxwell and Johnson (2000): Fv = Fm – F0
Fv/Fm (the maximal efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the dark-adapted state) was calculated as: Fv/Fm = (Fm – F0)/Fm
qP (the photochemical quenching coefficient): qP = (Fm´ – Fs) / ( Fm´ – F0´)
qN (non-photochemical quenching coefficient): qN = 1 – (Fm´ – F0´) / (Fm – F0).
ϕPSII (the actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport in the light-adapted state):
ϕPSII = (Fm´ – Fs)/ Fm´, which was equal to the product of qP and Fv´ /Fm´. Thus, ö PSII depends on the degree of closure of PSII reaction centers and the efficiency of excitation energy capture in PSII.
ETR (Apparent photosynthetic electron transport rate): Apparent electron transport rates (ETR) are derived from effective quantum yields of photosystem II (ΔF/Fm´ or Y(II)) according to ETR = Y(II) x PAR x 0.42. In this equation, the PAR corresponds to the quantum flux density of photosynthetically active radiation, and the 0.42 is the product of light absorptance by an average green leaf (0.84) times the fraction of absorbed quanta available for photosystem II (0.5).
Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (SPSS 14.0; SPSS Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences were analyzed based on P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. Percentage data were subjected to arc sine transformation prior to statistical analysis.
Results And Discussion
Generally, desiccation tolerance was evaluated as the capacity of the plants to mitigate the excess ROS formed and thereby attenuating the oxidative stress within the plant. Photosynthetic components such as enzymes, chlorophylls, and carotenoids levels depend on the severity and duration of stress. In the present analysis, the total chlorophyll content was maintained by the fern during the different periods of desiccation stress (4 to 10th day) i.e., showed an increase from 0.352 (in control) to 0.353 mg/g at 10th day of desiccation treatment in the fern (Table-1). The optimal maintenance of chlorophyll content directly reflects the functional status of the fern against the desiccation stress management. Chlorophyll a/b ratio showed an initial increase (2nd day) followed by an decrease with the degree of desiccation till the day 10 of treatment. Carotenoids, the major accessory pigments showed steady increase up to 6th day and then decreased marginally (10th day) (Table-1). The pigments are effective antioxidants and therefore, protect the cells from oxidative stress by mitigating ROSs formed during photo-oxidative stress.
|Table 1: Pigment content in the fern treated with desiccation and rehydration stress (D – desiccated; R- rehydrated)|
|Chl a/chl b||1.79||1.8||2.12||1.76||2.00||1.42||1.42||1.48||1.45||1.64||1.78|
|Tot chl/tot car||6.9||5.37||5.81||6.06||7.23||4.85||4.65||6.78||6.23||4.50||3.97|
Chlorophyll fluorescence emission is a versatile tool for quick and non-intrusive estimation of the photosynthetic activity and photoinhibition in the leaves against environmental stresses. Initially, after 2 d desiccation the F0 level increased whereas, the Fm value decreased in the frond when compared to control. This leads to a decline in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) to 0.61. From 4th to 8th day of desiccation F0, Fm, Fv and Fv/Fm values were maintained. The effective quantum yield of PSII (öPSII) and photochemical quenching (qP) also showed a similar trend. In contrast, the non-photochemical quenching (qN) was increased at 2 d desiccated fronds with improvement in apparent photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) also. Fo/Fm ratio, known as the basal quantum yield displayed a range from 0.198 to 0.38 (Table – 2). Rehydration application regained these parameters of desiccation stressed ferns compared to the stressed plants. A significant correlation was observed in 2 d desiccated ferns compared with in terms of marginal necrosis in the fronds.
|Table 2: Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters|
Generally, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters are ideal markers of PSII and photosynthetic activity in stressed plants (Kifah and Jaroslav, 2015). Maximum quantum efficacy of PSII (Fv/Fm) refers the photosynthetic efficiency of the leaf (Maghsoudi et al., 2015). Thus, Fv/Fm is widely used to evaluate stress-induced impairment in the chloroplast. The present results revealed that desiccation stress resulted an initial reduced Fv/Fm (Table – 2) which may be due to the decreased efficiency of energy transfer from the antennae to the reaction centers and / or inhibition of the activity circumscribed around PSII reaction centers (Abdeshahian et al., 2010). The decline in Fv/Fm suggests the possible damage occurred to PSII (Yamane et al., 2008). Amirjani (2010) reported that the decline in Fv/Fm might retard the rate of photosynthesis, thereby inhibiting plant growth and development.
Lepedu et al., (2012) reported a reduction in photochemistry among drought-stressed cowpea plants but, its overall photosynthetic efficiency remained unaffected. The desiccation induced suppression noticed initially (2d after desiccation) with the apparent photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) revealing the initial imbalance of the fern against drought stress with an increase of qN. This may be to counter balance the excessive light energy with reduction in photosynthetic rate. Thus, the photochemical down-regulation related with the stress payway to reduction in ETR (Arabzadeh, 2013).
In this study, 2 day desiccation increased the non-photochemical quenching (qN) but later qN was maintained at optimal level. Yamane et al., (2008) reported chloroplast damage in rice due to photo-inhibition that was induced by high salinity condition. Photo-inhibition may also retard and reverse the reduction in photosynthetic efficacy that partially impairs transformation of radiation energy into net assimilatory products. Hazem et al., (2011) reported the effect of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Further, the excessive light energy could be dissipated as heat through qN. Cha-um (2013) suggested that adequate supply of CO2 for carbon reactions may prevent photoinhibition, which has been reflected as significantly higher Fv/Fm value in the cowpea plants and others against salinity stress. In the present study, desiccation initially reduced the Fv/Fm values, but was subsequently maintained significantly in the fern during 4, 6, 8th days of desiccation.There were different interpretations regarding the variation in the level of F0 such as an estimation of the relative size of the antenna pigment complexes of the PSII (Kadir and Von Weihe, 2007).
Contreras-Porcia et al., (2011) also suggested that in Porphyra columbina an increase in F0 leads to symptom of damage to the PSII reaction center, resulting in a reduction in absorbed light and a subsequent increase in unused emitted light. The results of present study showed that desiccation stress reduced Fm initially, but maintained the photosynthetic quenching. Maghsoudi et al., (2015) also showed a reduction in Fm but an increase in Fo/Fm in wheat seedlings under water deficit stress. Additionally, De Lucena et al., (2012) reported in mango that a reduction in Fv/Fm ratio, under stress conditions, is often an indicator of photoinhibition or injury to PSII complex. Therefore, the increase in non-photochemical quenching can be expected under desiccation stress as a result of decrease in the utilization of light energy due to a drought-induced reduction in PSII activity (Fv/Fm). This might explain the increase in the value of F0/Fm in silicon treated wheat under water-deficit conditions (Maghsoudi et al., 2015).
Several studies have reported stress-induced increases in the values of F0/Fm and qN and decreases in Fv/Fm, qP, F0, and cpPSII (Pellegrini et al., 2011; De Lucena et al., 2012; Contreras-Porcia et al., 2011). In the fern, D. linearis, under desiccation stress at 4, 6, 8 days significantly increased the value of Fv/Fm as well as that of qP (Table – 2). Reductions in the values of F0/Fm and qN and increases in Fv/Fm, qP, F0, and ö PSII have been reported in many plants under abiotic stress conditions (Pellegrini et al., 2011; De Lucena et al., 2012; Contreras-Porcia et al., 2011). Similarly, Al-aghabary et al., (2004) have reported in tomato that addition of silicon to the root growing medium of salt-stressed plants enhanced Fv/Fm as well as improved the photochemical efficiency of PSII through antioxidant machineries.
The present results revealed that the ferns can withstand desiccation via maximum quantum yield of PSII and photochemical quenching. The chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic pigments suggest enhanced drought tolerance of the ferns. The fern alleviate the adverse effects of desiccation through the pigments and also effective ROSs scavenging mechanism. Further studies are warranted at molecular level to analyze the antioxidant enzymes and stress protein up regulation in the fern.
The authors thank the University Grant Commission regional office, Bangalore for providing FDP status to the teacher fellow for completing the Ph.D. work (Order No.F.No.FIP/12th plan/KLKE021 TF 06).
Abdeshahian M., Nabipour M., and Meskarbashee M. (2010). Chlorophyll Fluorescence as Criterion for the Diagnosis Salt Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Plants. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering 4(11): 839-841.
Al-aghabary K., Zhu Z., and Shi Q. (2004). Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 2101–2115.
Alpert P. (2006). Constraints of tolerance, why are desiccation-tolerant organisms so small or rare? Journal of Experimental Biology 209:1575–1584.
Alpert P. (2000).The discovery, scope, and puzzle of desiccation tolerance in plants. Plant Ecology 151(1): 5-17.
Amirjani M.R. (2010). Effect of NaCl on Some Physiological Parameters of Rice. European Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (1): 06-16.
Arabzadeh N. 2013. The impact of drought stress on photosynthetic quantum yield in Haloxylon aphyllum and Haloxylon persicum. African Journal of Plant Science 7(6): 185-189.
Arnon D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24: 1-15.
Burritt D.J., Larkindale J., and Hurd K. (2002). Antioxidant metabolism in the intertidal red seaweed Stictosiphonia arbuscula following desiccation. Planta 215: 829–838.
Cha-um S., Batin C.B., Samphumphung T., and Kidmanee C. (2013). Physio-morphological changes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) and jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.) in responses to soil salinity. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7(13): 2128-2135.
Contreras-Porcia L., Thomas D., Flores V., and Correa J. A.(2011). Tolerance to oxidative stress induced by desiccation in Porphyra columbina (Bangiales, Rhodophyta).Journal of Experimental Botany 62(6): 1815–1829.
De Lucena C.C., De Siqueira D. L., Prieto Martinez H. E., and Cecon Cicero P. R.(2012). Salt stress change chlorophyll fluorescence in mango. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 34(4): 1245-1255.
Demmig-Adams B., Adams William W.A.III., Barker D.H., Logan B.A., Bowling D.R. and Verhoeven A.S. (1996). Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiologia Plantarum 98: 253-264.
Hazem M. K., Govindjeeb., Karolina B., Janusz K., and Krystyna .Z. U. (2011). Effects of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environmental and Experimental Botany 73:64–72.
Kadir S., and Von Weihe M. (2007). Photochemical Efficiency and Recovery of Photosystem II in Grapes after Exposure to Sudden and Gradual Heat Stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 132(6):764–769.
Kifah A., and Jaroslav P.(2015). Detection of plant stress by chlorophyll fluorescence. MendelNet 400-404.
Lepedu H., Brki I., Cesar V., Jurkovi V., Antunovi J., Jambrovi A., Brki J., and Simi D .(2012). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of photosynthetic performance in seven maize inbred lines under water-limited conditions. Periodicum Biologorum 114(1): 73–76.
Maghsoudi K., Emam Y., and Ashraf M. (2015). Influence of foliar application of silicon on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments, and growth in water-stressed wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance. Turkish Journal of Botany 39: 625-634.
Pearson G .A ., Hoarau G.,LagoLeston A.,Coyer J.A ., Kube M., Reniharldt R., Henckel K., Ester T. A, Serrão., Corre E., and Olsen J.L. (2010). An Expressed Sequence Tag Analysis of the Intertidal Brown Seaweeds Fucus serratus (L.) and F.vesiculosus (L.) (Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae) in Response to Abiotic Stressors. Marine Biotechnology 12(2):195-213.
Pellegrini E., Carucci M.G., Campanella A., Lorenzini G., and Nali C. (2011). Ozone stress in Melissa officinalis plants assessed by photosynthetic function. Environmental and Experimental Botany 73: 94–101.
Sinsawat V., Leipner J., Stamp P., and Fracheboud Y. 2004. Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic apparatus in maize (Zea mays L.) grown at control or high temperature. Environmental and Experimental Botany 52: 123-129.
Vicré M., Farrant J. M., and Driouich A.(2004). Insights into the cellular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance among angiosperm resurrection plant species. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 1329–1340.
Wen X., Qiu N., Lu Q., and Lu C.(2005).Enhanced thermo tolerance of photosystem II in salt-adapted plants of the halophyte Artemisia anethifolia. Planta 220(3):486-497.
Wise R.R., Olson A.J., Schrader S.M., and Sharkey T.D.( 2004). Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell and Environment 27:717–724.
Yamane K., Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M., and Miyake H. (2008). Correlation between Chloroplast Ultrastructure and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in the Leaves of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grown under Salinity. Plant Production Science 11(1):139 -145.
Zhani K., Ben F. M., Mani F., and Hannachi C. (2012). Impact of salt stress (NaCl) on growth, chlorophyll content and fluorescence of Tunisian cultivars of chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.). Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry 8(4): 236-252.
Zou D.H., and Gao K.S. (2002b). Effects of desiccation and CO2 concentrations on emersed photosynthesis in Porphyra haitanensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta), a species farmed in China. European Journal of Phycology 37: 587-592.
Zou D.H., and Gao K.S. (2002a). Photosynthetic responses to inorganic carbon in Ulva lactuca under aquatic and aerial states. Acta Bot Sin 44: 1291-1296.