1Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
2College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
3Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Family and Community Medicine Prince Sultan Military Medical City
5Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
6Department of Histopathology and Cytology, FMLS, University of Khartoum, Sudan
Corresponding author email: Hussaingad5@gmail.com
Article Publishing History
Received: 10/05/2020
Accepted After Revision: 25/06/2020
In recent years, obesity/overweight has represented a major health issue in Saudi Arabia, particularly among the younger population. Consequently, the current investigation is aimed to characterize the personalized perceptions and attitudes towards healthy weight management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. the personalized perceptions and attitudes towards healthy weight management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of obesity/overweight was 53%. The majority of the participants believe that “Calories’ contents knowledge”, can maintain a healthy body weight followed by “Reducing meal quantity”, “Reducing meals frequencies”, and “Reducing meals frequencies and Reducing meal quantity”, constituting 223/315(70.8%), 210/313(67%), 161/313(51.4%), and 127/313(40.6%), respectively. Obesity/overweight is prevalent in Northern Saudi Arabia, which is behavioral and habitual determinant in most occasions. Personalized bodyweight determinant factors, including food intake habits, have a strong impact on Saudi weight management.
Obesity, overweight, weight loss, BMI, Saudi Arabia
Alreshidi F. S, Alfarsi A. S. S, Alenezi R. A. B. M, Alreshidi N. F, Almansour B. M, Alrasheedi S. N, Aljarwan N. S, Aljarwan M. S, Abanami N. M, Ahmed H. G. Personalized Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Healthy Weight Management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2020;13(2).
Alreshidi F. S, Alfarsi A. S. S, Alenezi R. A. B. M, Alreshidi N. F, Almansour B. M, Alrasheedi S. N, Aljarwan N. S, Aljarwan M. S, Abanami N. M, Ahmed H. G. Personalized Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Healthy Weight Management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. Biosc.Biotech.Res.Comm. 2020;13(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/3hDFRg7
Copyright © Alreshidi et al., This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) https://creativecommns.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium, provide the original author and source are credited.
INTRODUCTION
Obesity/overweight (classified by Body Mass Index (BMI)) is a growing health issue worldwide associated with increased mortality due to its strong link to diverse comorbidities. Several diseases well documented to be resulting from obesity/overweight conditions including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, sleep apnoea, cancers, and some mental disorders (Fava et al 2019; Sung et al 2019; Mouton et al 2020).Many dietary and food habits have been linked to the increasing burden of obesity/overweight due to the imbalance of energy consumed within the food. Diets rich in processed food, trans/saturated fatty acids, sugars rich diets are the most weight (wt.) gain factors. Conversely, physical inactivity, low intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, and legumes can also elevate the risk of obesity (Legaand Lipscombe 2020).The etiology of obesity/overweight is extremely complicated, comprising an interaction of biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors. As a result, maintaining or achieving a healthy weight is challenging, and several weight loss accomplishments soon initiated with weight regain (Ataey et al 2020).
In recent years, an increase in self-attempts of weight loss worldwide. Maintaining continued weight loss requires continued management of dietary, food intake habits/behaviors, and other strategies (Evans et al 2020). However, the self-insight of weight loss and weight maintenance may promote long-term healthy weight maintenance (Han et al 2019; Dhurandhar et al 2019). The highest reported obesity/overweight prevalence rates (63.6%) (Ahmed et al 2014) in Saudi Arabia were from Ha’il region, Northern Saudi Arabia. Consequently, the current study aimed to characterize the personalized perceptions and attitudes towards healthy weight management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
the personalized perceptions and attitudes towards healthy weight management in Ha’il Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. Attractants of maintaining normal BMI, attitude towards food intake, and maintaining healthy body weight, the claimed causes of weight gain, and regular meal habits (Pardo et al 2004).
Data analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V22.0 SPSS. Frequencies and percentages and cross-tabulation of variables were obtained.
Ethical consent: Each participant has consented before the personal interview. The proposal of the study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the College of Medicine, University of Ha’il, Hail, Saudi Arabia. Ethical Approval Number: EC-00140/CM/UOH.01/19
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This study investigated 315 volunteers, aged 17 to 56 years with a mean age of 21 years. The majority of respondents were males 281(89%) compared to 34(11%) females. The great majority of the study subjects were aged 20 to 24 years, representing 176/315(56%), followed by age range 25-29 and ≤19 years constituting 62(20%) and 57(18%), respectively. The great majority of the participants were with the university level of education constituting 272 (86%). The great majority of the participants were students constituting 287 (91%), as shown in Table 1, Fig 1.
Out of the 315 participants, 90(29%) were over wt. and 77(24%) were obese, as shown in Table 1, Fig 1.
Table 1. Distribution of the study population by demographical features
Variable | Males | Females | Total |
Age | |||
≤19 years | 49 | 8 | 57 |
20-24 | 163 | 13 | 176 |
25-29 | 54 | 8 | 62 |
≥30 | 15 | 5 | 20 |
Total | 281 | 34 | 315 |
Education | |||
Basic education | 9 | 5 | 14 |
University education | 272 | 29 | 301 |
Occupation | |||
Student | 259 | 28 | 287 |
Employee | 15 | 4 | 19 |
Others | 7 | 2 | 9 |
BMI | |||
Underweight | 26 | 2 | 28 |
Normal weight | 107 | 13 | 120 |
Overweight | 81 | 9 | 90 |
obese | 67 | 10 | 77 |
Figure 1: Demographical features and BMI
The most common attractant for maintaining normal body weight among the study subjects was “having a nice look” followed by “disease prevention”, “improve mood”, and “spend time”, representing 146/306(47.7%), 110/306(36%), 45/306(14.7%), and 15/306(4.9%), in that order. Out of 146 requiring “nice look”, 36/146(25%) were obese and 59/146(40%) were over wt. Out of 110 demanding “disease prevention”, 42/110(38%) were obese and 33/110(30%) were over wt. Out of 45 demanding “improve mood”, 11/45(24%) were obese and 24/45(53.3%) were over wt. The majority of those demanding “spend time” were over wt. 8/15(53.3%), as indicated in Table 2, Fig 2.
Table 2. Distribution of the study population by attractants of maintaining normal BMI
Category | Variable | Under wt. | Normal wt. | Over wt. | Obese | Total |
Disease prevention | ||||||
Yes | 1 | 34 | 33 | 42 | 110 | |
No | 24 | 81 | 56 | 35 | 196 | |
Response | 25 | 115 | 89 | 77 | 306 | |
Look Nice | ||||||
Yes | 4 | 47 | 59 | 36 | 146 | |
No | 21 | 67 | 30 | 41 | 160 | |
Response | 25 | 115 | 89 | 77 | 306 | |
Improve mood | ||||||
Yes | 0 | 10 | 24 | 11 | 45 | |
No | 25 | 105 | 65 | 66 | 261 | |
Spend Time | ||||||
Yes | 1 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 15 | |
No | 24 | 112 | 81 | 74 | 291 |
Figure 2: Proportions of attractants of maintaining normal BMI
Table 3, summarized the distribution of the study population by BMI and attitude towards food intake and maintaining healthy body weight. The majority of the participants believe that “Calories’ contents knowledge”, can maintain a healthy body weight followed by “Reducing meal quantity”, “Reducing meals frequencies”, and “Reducing meals frequencies and Reducing meal quantity”, constituting 223/315(70.8%), 210/313(67%), 161/313(51.4%), and 127/313(40.6%), respectively. Out of the 223, 210, 161, and 127, over wt./obese represented 120/223(53.8%), 120/210(57%), 94/161(58.4%), and 68/127(53.5%), correspondingly.
About 153/313(49%) of participants “Did efforts to maintain healthy weight” of whom 86/153(56.2%) were over wt./obese. Around 71/313(22.7%) of participants “Did you regularly measure your wt” of whom 47/71(66.2%) were over wt./obese, as indicated in Table 3.
Table 3. Distribution of the study population by BMI and attitude towards food intake and maintaining a healthy body weight
Category | Variable | Under wt. | Normal wt. | Over wt. | Obese | Total |
Reducing meals frequencies | ||||||
Yes | 12 | 55 | 51 | 43 | 161 | |
Not sure | 10 | 44 | 29 | 24 | 107 | |
No | 6 | 20 | 9 | 10 | 45 | |
Response | 28 | 119 | 89 | 77 | 313 | |
Reducing meal quantity | ||||||
Yes | 14 | 76 | 58 | 62 | 210 | |
Not sure | 10 | 31 | 23 | 9 | 73 | |
No | 4 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 30 | |
Response | 28 | 119 | 89 | 77 | 313 | |
Reducing meals frequencies and Reducing meal quantity | ||||||
Yes | 14 | 45 | 42 | 26 | 127 | |
Not sure | 12 | 48 | 32 | 27 | 119 | |
No | 2 | 26 | 15 | 24 | 67 | |
Calories’ contents knowledge | ||||||
Yes | 16 | 87 | 67 | 53 | 223 | |
Not sure | 11 | 20 | 15 | 19 | 65 | |
No | 1 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 27 | |
Response | 28 | 120 | 90 | 77 | 315 | |
Did efforts to maintain a healthy weight | ||||||
Yes | 6 | 61 | 53 | 33 | 153 | |
No | 22 | 58 | 36 | 44 | 160 | |
Response | 28 | 119 | 89 | 77 | 313 | |
Did you regularly measure your wt | ||||||
Yes | 3 | 21 | 34 | 13 | 71 | |
No | 25 | 97 | 56 | 64 | 242 | |
Response | 28 | 118 | 90 | 77 | 313 |
Table 4, summarized the distribution of the study population by BMI and the claimed causes of weight gain. About 49/308(16%), 112/314(35.7%), and 168/303(55.4%), believed that “Living alone”, “Increased appetite”, and “Food habits” are the main causes of weight gain. Out of the 49, 112, and 168 participants, 25/49(51%), 78/112(69.6%), and 122/168(72.6%) were over wt./obese.
For “meals frequencies per day”, 9/21(43%), 56/104(53.8%), 86/149(57.7%), and 16/41(39%) of over wt./obese individuals were found to take meals, once, twice, 3times and more than 3 times, respectively. For “Snacks frequencies per day”, 73/139(52.5%), 59/114(51.8%), 25/43(58%), and 6/14(43%) of over wt./obese individuals were found to take meals, once, twice, 3times and more than 3 times, respectively, see Table 4.For “Fast food frequencies”, 34/68(50%), 73/138(53%), 33/60(55%), 13/25(52%), 7/10(70%), and 7/12(58.3%) of over wt./obese individuals were found to take meals, every day, twice/week, once/week, Once/month, rare and never, one-to-one, see Table 4.For “Vegetables and fruit intake”, 23/51(45%), 52/98(53%), 40/78(51.3%), 17/25(68%), 17/49(34.7%), and 4/5(80%) of over wt./obese individuals were found to take meals, every day, twice/week, once/week, Once/month, rare and never, one-to-one, see Table 4.
Table 4. Distribution of the study population by BMI and the claimed causes of weight gain
Category | Variable | Under wt. | Normal wt. | Over wt. | Obese | Total |
Living alone | ||||||
Yes | 2 | 22 | 19 | 6 | 49 | |
No | 25 | 94 | 69 | 71 | 259 | |
Response | 27 | 116 | 88 | 77 | 308 | |
Increased appetite | ||||||
Yes | 5 | 29 | 43 | 35 | 112 | |
No | 23 | 91 | 47 | 41 | 202 | |
Response | 28 | 120 | 90 | 76 | 314 | |
Food habits are the main causes of weight gain | ||||||
Yes | 7 | 39 | 62 | 60 | 168 | |
No | 17 | 75 | 26 | 17 | 135 | |
Response | 24 | 114 | 88 | 77 | 303 | |
Meals frequencies per day | ||||||
Once | 2 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 21 | |
Twice | 10 | 38 | 33 | 23 | 104 | |
3times | 11 | 52 | 41 | 45 | 149 | |
More than 3 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 6 | 41 | |
Response | 28 | 120 | 90 | 77 | 315 | |
Snacks frequencies per day | ||||||
Once | 12 | 54 | 35 | 38 | 139 | |
Twice | 13 | 42 | 35 | 24 | 114 | |
3times | 3 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 43 | |
More than 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 14 | |
Response | 28 | 119 | 88 | 75 | 310 | |
Fast food frequencies | ||||||
Every day | 8 | 26 | 20 | 14 | 68 | |
Twice/week | 14 | 51 | 38 | 35 | 138 | |
Once/week | 4 | 23 | 19 | 14 | 60 | |
Once/month | 2 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 25 | |
Rare | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | |
Never | 0 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 12 | |
Response | 28 | 118 | 90 | 77 | 313 | |
Vegetables and fruit intake | ||||||
Every day | 4 | 24 | 11 | 12 | 51 | |
Twice/week | 6 | 40 | 34 | 18 | 98 | |
Once/week | 9 | 29 | 18 | 22 | 78 | |
Once/month | 0 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 25 | |
Rare | 7 | 15 | 16 | 11 | 49 | |
Never | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Response | 26 | 117 | 88 | 75 | 306 |
The distribution of the study population by BMI and regular meal habits was summarized in Table 5, Fig 3. About 181/301(60%) didn’t use to take their breakfast (BF) regularly, of whom 98/181(54%) were over wt./obese, compared to 63/120(52.5%) over wt./obese persons among those taking their breakfast regularly. The risk of over wt./obese associated with irregular breakfast, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.0041 (0.8099 to 1.2449), P = 0.9703, as indicated in Table 5, Fig 3.
About 196/311(63%) use to take their dinner meal regularly, of whom 103/196(52.6%) were over wt./obese, compared to 64/115(55.7%) over wt./obese persons among those taking their dinner irregularly. The risk of over wt./obese associated with regular dinner, the RR(95%CI) = 0.9443(0.7650 to 1.1655), P = 0.5935, as indicated in Table 5, Fig 3.Over wt./obese individuals represented 21/47(44.7%), 92/167(55%), 53/95(55.8%) of those used to take little, normal, and heavy dinner meal quantity, in that order, as indicated in Table 5, Fig 3.
Table 5. Distribution of the study population by BMI and regular meals habits
Category | Variable | Under wt. | Normal wt. | Over wt. | Obese | Total |
Taking Breakfast(BF) regularly | ||||||
Yes | 9 | 47 | 31 | 33 | 120 | |
No | 16 | 67 | 55 | 43 | 181 | |
Response | 25 | 114 | 86 | 76 | 301 | |
Taking dinner regularly | ||||||
Yes | 13 | 80 | 58 | 45 | 196 | |
No | 14 | 37 | 32 | 32 | 115 | |
Response | 27 | 117 | 90 | 77 | 311 | |
Dinner quantity(DQ) | ||||||
Little | 5 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 47 | |
Normal | 14 | 61 | 53 | 39 | 167 | |
Heavy | 8 | 34 | 24 | 29 | 95 | |
Response | 27 | 116 | 90 | 76 | 309 |
Figure 3: BMI and regular meals habits
In recent years, Obesity/overweight represented a major health issue in Saudi Arabia, particularly among the younger population. Consequently, multifarious efforts are ongoing to find out suitable strategies to tackle the burden of obesity-related health consequences. Obesity/overweight prevention and healthy weight management are from the top recommendations.
The present study attempted to explore personalized perceptions and attitudes towards healthy weight management in order to assist in the establishment of future plans and strategies to reduce the burden of obesity in the Saudi community.In the present study, the prevalence of obesity/overweight was 53%. These findings support a previous similar study from Saudi Arabia reporting obesity/overweight prevalence of 55.1% among adults population aged 18 to 60 years old (Azzeh et al 2017). A more recent study from Saudi Arabia reported a prevalence of 65.9% for obesity/overweight (Al-Qahtani 2019).
In the present study, the most common attractant for maintaining normal body weight among the study subjects was “having a nice look” followed by “disease prevention”, “improve mood”, and “spend time”, representing 47.7%, 36%, 14.7%, and 4.9%, in that order. Although aiming at all of these attractants has some beneficial effects on an individual’s quality of life, “disease prevention” is the most important factor. Several studies have documented the role of maintaining healthy body weight in preventing diverse diseases including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other miscellaneous diseases (Muralidharan et al 2019; Pallazola et al 2019).To achieve successful weight loss outcomes, adherence to multifarious approaches may increase the chance of maintaining long-term optimum weight (Coupe et al 2019).
In this study, many participants believe that “Calories’ contents knowledge”, “Reducing meal quantity”, “Reducing meal frequencies”, and “Reducing meal frequencies and reducing meal quantity”, have strong impacts on determining individual weight. However, meal quantity, frequencies, and calories contents are well-documented as body weight determinant (Lopes et al 2019). Besides, the food caloric contents and quantity, the balance between consumed energy and energy expenditure is another important factor determining an individual’s weight management (Lu et al 2019). Increasing meal frequencies with low caloric contents may lead to weight loss, due to the energy consumed in the metabolic process.
Approximately 56% of the participants claimed planning for weight loss. Moreover, about 66% claimed regular weight measurement. These measures indicating low awareness of maintaining a healthy weight. In the present study, many participants were accustomed to high frequencies of snacks and fast food with relatively low intake of vegetables and fruits. Such behaviors and dietary habits can increase the possibility of weight gain (Ahmed et al 2019).
In the present study meals, regularity status and quantity didn’t reveal significant differences, though the risk of weight gain was elevated with breakfast irregularity and heavy dinner.The limitation of the present study includes its cross-sectional setting, younger population, and qualitative assessment.
CONCLUSION
Obesity/overweight is prevalent in Northern Saudi Arabia, which is behavioral and habitual determinant on most occasions. Personalized bodyweight determinant factors, including food intake habits, have a strong impact on Saudi weight management.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank the students at the College of Medicine, the University of Ha’il for their assistance in sample collection.
REFERENCES
Ahmed HG, Ginawi IA, Elasbali AM, Ashankyty IM, Al-Hazimi AM (2014) Prevalence of obesity in Hail region, KSA: in a comprehensive survey J Obes 2014:961861. doi:10.1155/2014/961861
Ahmed J, Alnasir F, Jaradat A, Al Marabheh AJ, Hamadeh RR (2019) Association of Overweight and Obesity with High Fast Food Consumption by Gulf Cooperation Council Medical Students Ecol Food Nutr 58(5)495‐510. doi:10.1080/03670244.2019.1613986
Al-Qahtani AM (2019) Prevalence and Predictors of Obesity and Overweight among Adults Visiting Primary Care Settings in the Southwestern Region, Saudi Arabia Biomed Res Int 2019 8073057. doi:10.1155/2019/8073057
Ataey A, Jafarvand E, Adham D, Moradi-Asl E (2020) The Relationship Between Obesity, Overweight, and the Human Development Index in World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region Countries J Prev Med Public Health 53(2)98‐105. doi:10.3961/jpmph.19.100
Azzeh FS, Bukhari HM, Header EA, Ghabashi MA, Al-Mashi SS, Noorwali NM (2017) Trends in overweight or obesity and other anthropometric indices in adults aged 18-60 years in western Saudi Arabia Ann Saudi Med 37(2)106‐113. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2017.106
Coupe N, Peters S, Rhodes S, Cotterill S (2019) The effect of commitment-making on weight loss and behaviour change in adults with obesity/overweight; a systematic review BMC Public Health19(1) 816. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7185-3
Dhurandhar NV, Kyle T, Stevenin B, Tomaszewski K; ACTION Steering Group. Predictors of weight loss outcomes in obesity care: results of the national ACTION study (2019) BMC Public Health 19(1)1422. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7669-1
Evans EH, Sainsbury K, Marques MM, et al. (2019) Prevalence and predictors of weight loss maintenance: a retrospective population-based survey of European adults with overweight and obesity J Hum Nutr Diet 32(6):745‐753. doi:10.1111/jhn.12666
Han L, You D, Zeng F, et al (2019) Trends in Self-perceived Weight Status, Weight Loss Attempts, and Weight Loss Strategies Among Adults in the United States, 1999-2016 [published correction appears in JAMA Netw Open. 2(12):e1919047]. JAMA Netw Open 2(11):e1915219. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15219
Lega IC, Lipscombe LL (2020) Review: Diabetes, Obesity, and Cancer-Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications Endocr Rev 41(1) bnz014. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnz014
Lopes AEDSC, Araújo LF, Levy RB, Barreto SM, Giatti L (2019) Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and serum C-reactive protein levels: cross-sectional results from the ELSA-Brasil study Sao Paulo Med J 137(2)169‐176. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0363070219
Lu TM , Chiu HF , Chen YM , et al. (2019) Effect of a balanced nutrition meal replacement diet with altered macromolecular composition along with caloric restriction on body weight control. Food Funct 10(6)3581‐3588. doi:10.1039/c9fo00192a
Mouton AJ, Li X, Hall ME, Hall JE (2020) Obesity, Hypertension, and Cardiac Dysfunction: Novel Roles of Immunometabolism in Macrophage Activation and Inflammation. Circ Res 126(6)789‐806. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.312321
Muralidharan S, Ranjani H, Mohan Anjana R, et al. (2019) Engagement and Weight Loss: Results from the Mobile Health and Diabetes Trial Diabetes Technol Ther 21(9):507‐513. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0134
Pallazola VA, Davis DM, Whelton SP, et al. (2019)A Clinician’s Guide to Healthy Eating for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 3(3) 251‐267. doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.05.001
Pardo A, Ruiz M, Jódar E, et al. (2004) Development of a questionnaire for the assessment and quantification of overweight and obesity related lifestyles Nutr Hosp 19(2)99‐109.
Sung H, Siegel RL, Torre LA, et al.(2019) Global patterns in excess body weight and the associated cancer burden CA Cancer J Clin 69(2) 88‐112. doi:10.3322/caac.21499