Kasnaviyeh, Nasiri, Mohammadi and Vaziri
INTRODUCTION
Formaldehyde is a chemical material with a nasty smell
(Golalipour et al. 2007). Which is used in xing cadav-
ers, histology processes, synthetic resins, wooden and
plastic productions and industrial ber production for-
maldehyde has a negative effect on performance of body
organs (Mendis-Handagama et al. 2007). It is metabo-
lized to formic acid by dehydrogenase formaldehyde
and dehydrogenase aldehyde enzymes in the liver and
erythrocyte which is exorcised through urine, excretion
and breathing with different macromolecules such as
protein, acid nucleic or interact with the light molecules
like amino acid (Cheng et al. 2003; Collins and Lineker,
2004). Formaldehyde can cause oxidative stress in the
body and has a bad effect on respiratory system and
blood circulation and kidney (Kini et al. 2004). Antioxi-
dants such a components that help body to destroy free
radicals oxidative stress is actually imbalance between
oxidants and antioxidants. When the amount of oxi-
dants increases, the cells are damaged. Antioxidants
include Vitamin A, E, C, Zn and selenium which play
a crucial rate on inhibition of free radicals and stability
of cell membrane (Kini et al. 2004). Vitamin C (Ascorbic
Acid) is a white or yellow odorless solid substrate with
the molecular formulation of C6H806. Ascorbic Acid is
produced in the liver of plants and animals (except some
special kind and human). Vitamin C operates as antioxi-
dants in the body and cause acceleration of Fe, Cu and
also revives of folic acid and collagen making (Kum et
al. 2011). Vitamin C as a soluble antioxidant becomes
active by moving oxygen and nitrogen elements (Rekha
et al. 2011).
Vitamin C has also an important role in protecting
the kidney and it can prevent increasing urea and cre-
atinine in the oxidative damage (Sokkary and Awadalla,
2011; Agarwal et al. 2010; Yurdakul et al. 2010). One of
the most important damage of formaldehyde is kidney
damage (Umemura et al. 2009; Coronel et al. 2010). Oxi-
dants are able to change proliferative in the glomerule
structure of kidney (Coronel et al. 2010; Saleem et al.
2012). Antioxidants consumption can prevent damage
of kidney (Djeffal et al. 2011; Ememghorashy et al. 2012;
Claudia et al. 2003; Qiu et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2006).
The kidney performance can be evaluated by investigat-
ing the indicators of blood (Hai Xia et al. 2012; Ukmali
et al. 2011). With regard to the formaldehyde effects in
making oxidative stress, free radicals and their effect
on kidney performance and in accordance with the
performed studies related to the formaldehyde on the
kidney tissue changes as glomerule vascular congestion
and also minor decline holes in the pipe cells and studies
about the protection effect of Vitamin C on prevention
of formaldehyde damage (Sajadi et al. 2008; Farmahini
et al. 2008), in this study, we decided to investigate the
protection effect of Vitamin C on kidney performance of
mats after exposing to formaldehyde.
METHODOLOGY OF PLAN PERFORMANCE
Ether was used in this study to anesthesia the rats and
5cc syringe with anatomy tools was used for phlebotomy
and also centrifugal tool for separating rat’s serum. In
this study 24 adult rat of vista bread were selected and
divided into 3 equal groups. The rst group (c) received
1cc/kg of normal saline and the second group (E2)
received 10 mg/kg formaldehyde and the third group
(E3) received both 10mg/kg formaldehyde and 200 mg/
kg Vitamin C in 10 days by injection into peritoneal.
During the study, the rats were under normal condition
of shelter with 24±2 temperature and appropriate feed-
ing. 3 weeks after nishing the injection phlebotomy,
after anesthesia by sterile syringe was performed. After
making occulation by centrifuge, samples were sepa-
rated with 1500 rpm during 10 minutes and they were
kept in -20 c till testing for evaluation of urea and cre-
atinine. The amount of urea and creatinine by using Pars
Azmoon kits and auto analyzer tool (Biotectica Instru-
ment BT 1000) were evaluated and Calorimetric was
done on kits to evaluate urea and jaffe was performed to
evaluate creatinine. Data analysis after entering the data
to SPSS Ver 18 was done by using Shapiro-wilk test to
investigate normality of cantinas quantitative data dis-
tribution. The explicit result of the groups was reported
as average and deviation from standard deviation. The
comparison between the investigated groups was per-
formed by using ANOVA test. If the average differences
of statistic results were meaningful the LSD test were
used to compare them. The meaningful level was con-
sidered less than 0.05 (P<0.05)
RESULTS
The urea result was meaningful in 3 groups (P<0.05)
and the increase of urea in E1 group (after receiving
formaldehyde) rather than C group (after receiving
normal saline) was also meaningful (P<0.05). While
the increase amount of urea in E2 group (after receiv-
ing formaldehyde and Vitamin C) rather than C group
was not meaningful (p=0.239). The increase amount of
urea in E1 group rather than E2 was not meaningful
(p=0.149). The creatinine result in 3 groups was mean-
ingful (p<0.05). The increase amount of creatinine of E1
group in comparison with C group was also meaningful
(p<0.05) and the increase amount of creatinine in E2
group in comparison with C group was also meaning-
ful (p<0.05). While the increase amount of creatinine
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS INVESTIGATION OF PROTECTION EFFECT OF VITAMIN C ON KIDNEY PERFORMANCE 119