Shahram Mohaghegh
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS INSPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH IN WELL-TRAINED MALE IRANIAN SOCCER PLAYERS 811
INTRODUCTION
Maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) is a common
measurement of inspiratory muscle strength, which is
often used in a variety of exercises for estimation of the
inspiratory muscle strength and to evaluate the effects of
inspiratory muscle training , (Klusiewicz 2008). Inspira-
tory muscle training is classi ed into two major catego-
ries: inspiratory muscle strength training and inspiratory
muscle endurance training. Inspiratory muscle strength
training is performed by breathing against an external
inspiratory load. This load is often adjusted with refer-
ence to MIP. Inspiratory muscle training requires par-
ticipants to achieve a threshold pressure to open the
valve of an inspiratory muscle training device (e.g., the
POWER breathe inspiratory muscle trainer) to provide an
in ow of air. Substantial respiratory strength is needed
to achieve and maintain the target threshold pressure,
which ranged between 50 and 80% of MIP in different
studies, (HajGhanbari, Yamabayashi et al. 2013).
An understanding of elite athletes’ MIP character-
istics is necessary to guide sport-speci c inspiratory
muscle training programs , (Ohya, Hagiwara et al. 2016).
The characteristics of MIP have already been reported in
both young, (Leech, Ghezzo et al. 1983), and older adults
(Summerhill, Angov et al. 2007). To our knowledge, no
study has quanti ed and reported the MIPs of elite Ira-
nian athletes across a variety of sports. An understand-
ing of the characteristics of elite athletes’ MIPs is needed
to guide inspiratory muscle training programs relative
to speci c sports. The purpose of this pilot study was to
investigate and better understand the MIP characteris-
tics of well –trained Iranian male soccer players.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In a cross -sectional study, from 14 well trained 19 and
20-year old Iranian male soccer players, weight, height,
maximal inspiratory muscle pressure (MIP) and peak
inspiratory ow (PIF) were measured in summer 2014.
All subjects did not smoke, had at least 3 years com-
petitive experience at club or provincial level, trained
at least four times a week during the competitive sea-
son, and engage in tness sessions (e.g. gymnasium
training, jogging, cross-training) at least twice a week.
After obtaining written consent, proper device calibra-
tion and instruction to participants according to the
manual of the device and getting their consent, maxi-
mal respiratory pressures were measured by having the
subject expire completely and then perform a maximum
inspiratory maneuver through mouth while the nostrils
were closed (Mueller maneuver). Three measurements
were done and the best score was recorded. The meas-
urements were done by an experienced technician using
POWER breathe inspiratory muscle trainer (KH1 pressure
threshold device).The predicted MIP was measured based
on anthropometric data of athletes using this equation:
MIP = (0.158 BMI)-(0.051 age) + 8.22 , (Hautmann, Hefele
et al. 2000). The mean obtained MIP was compared to
mean MIP of some
male athletes in different sports from
different countries using ANOVA test. P value less than
0.05 was considered signi cant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Mean and Standard deviations of weight, height, MIP
and PIF were 73.6(6.6) kg, 179.5(6.7) cm, 99.21(32.34)
cmH2O and 5.57(1.46) lit/s respectively. The MIP meas-
ured values were within predicted limits for healthy men
based on anthropometric data6. MIP values were sig-
ni cantly lower than those found in most international
studies for elite and non-elite male athletes, (Table 1).
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is a reliable,
noninvasive factor for assessing the respiratory mus-
cle function, (Tudorache, Oancea et al. 2010). Recently
peak inspiratory ow (PIF) measurement has been of
interest as a reliable and accessible tool for assessment
of respiratory muscle strength in older adults, (Barnes,
Agyapong-Badu et al. 2014).
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is the most com-
monly used measure for assessment of inspiratory mus-
cle function. Subjective factors which may in uence
MIP include proper test performance, weight, age, sex,
height, tness level and smoking status (Sclauser Pessoa,
Franco Parreira et al. 2014) and (Harik-Khan, Wise et al.
1998). There is no agreement regarding which of these
variables have a signi cant in uence on MIP, (Soori,
Mohaghegh et al. 2016).
In this study, Mean and Standard deviations of
weight, height, MIP and PIF were 73.6(6.6) kg, 179.5(6.7)
cm, 99.21(32.34) cmH2O and 5.57(1.46) lit/s respec-
tively. There have not been reported any national MIP
values for healthy Iranian men to compare the measured
ones with them. MIP values were signi cantly lower
than those found in most international studies for male
athletes, (Table 1) (Santos, Rosa et al. 2012) and (Ohya,
Hagiwara et al. 2016). This may be the result of differ-
ences in measurements of MIP, or anthropometric vari-
ations in these studies or sports-speci c differences in
inspiratory muscle strength or real weaker inspiratory
muscles in Iranian athletes; although it is too early for
this conclusion as the number of participants in this
study was low. The MIP values of some athletes in spe-
ci c sports such as swimming and rowing tended to be
stronger (table 1). It has been mentioned that athletes
whose sport typically demands exercise-induced inspir-
atory muscle fatigue tend to have stronger MIP values
than other athletes, (Ohya, Hagiwara et al. 2016).