Elnaz Mousavi et al.
on the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register
pulp vitality reported the sensitivity, speci city, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value were cal-
culated for each method. The sensitivity was 0.83 for the
cold test, 0.86 for the heat test and 0.72 for the electrical
test. The speci city was 0.93 for the cold test, 0.41 for
the heat test and 0.93 for the electrical test. The positive
predictive value was 0.89 for the cold test, 0.48 for the
heat test and 0.88 for the electrical test, and the negative
predictive value was 0.90 for the cold test, 0.83 for the
heat test and 0.84 for the electrical test. This indicated
that the probability of a non-sensitive reaction repre-
senting a necrotic pulp was 89% with the cold test, 48%
with the heat test and 88% with the electrical test. It also
indicated that the probability of a sensitive reaction rep-
resenting a vital pulp was 90% with the cold test, 83%
with the heat test and 84% with the electrical test.
CONCLUSION
In a diagnostic test (cold, heat, and electrical), it is nec-
essary to know the probability that the test will provide
the correct diagnosis. In anterior teeth the heat test has
more accuracy than other one. In premolar and molar
teeth the cold test has more accuracy than other tests.
REFERENCES
Bender IB. (2000)Reversible and irreversible painful pulpitides:
diagnosis and treatment. Aust Endod Journal 26:10–4.
Chen E, Abbott PV. (2011) Evaluation of accuracy, reliability,
and repeatability of ve dental pulp tests. J Endod 37:1619–23.
Chen E, Abbott PV. Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, and repeat-
ability of ve dental pulp tests .J Endod 2011;37:1619–1623.
Dastmalchi N, Jafarzadeh H, Moradi S.(2012) (Comparison of
the ef cacy of a custom-made pulse oximeter probe with digi-
tal electric pulp tester, cold spray, and rubber cup for assessing
pulp vitality. J Endod 38:1182–6.
Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Moschen I, Strobl H. (2004) Diagnos-
tic characteristics of pulpal blood ow levels associated with
adverse outcomes of luxated permanent maxillary incisors.
Dent Traumatol 20:270–5.
Goho C. (1999)Pulse oximetry evaluation of vitality in primary
and immature permanent teeth Pediatr Dent 21:109-113
Gopikrishna V, Pradeep G, VenkaTeshbabu N. (2009) Assess-
ment of pulp vitality: a review. International Journal of Paedi-
atric Dentistry 19: 3–15.
Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. (2007) Evalua-
tion of ef cacy of a new custom-made pulse oximeter dental
probe in comparison with the electrical and thermal tests for
assessing pulp vitality. J Endod 33:411-4.
Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV.(2010) Review of pulp sensibility
tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod
J 43:738–62.
Lin J, Chandler N, Purton D, Monteith B (2007) Appropriate
electrode placement site for electric pulp testing rst molar
teeth. Journal of Endodontics 33, 1296-8.
Lin J, Chandler NP.(2008) Electric pulp testing: A review. Int
Endod Journal; 41:365-74.
Mejàre IA, Axelsson S, Davidson T.(2012) Diagnosis of the
condition of the dental pulp: a systematic review. International
Endodontic Journal 45, 597-613.
Myers JW. (1998) Demonstration of a possible source of error
with an electric pulp tester. J Endod 24:199–200.
Newton CW, Hoen MM, Goodis HE. (2009) Identify and deter-
mine the metrics, hierarchy, and predictive value of all the
parameters and/or methods used during endodontic diagnosis.
J Endod 35:1635–44.
Newton CW, Hoen MM, Goodis HE. (2009) Identify and deter-
mine the metrics, hierarchy, and predictive value of all the
parameters and/or methods used during endodontic diagnosis.
J Endod 35:1635–44
Peterson K, Soderstrom C, Kiani-Anaraki M, Ltvy G.(1999)
Evaluation of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to reg-
ister pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traumatol 15: 127-1 3 1.
Rutsatz C, Baumhardt SG, Feldens CA. (2012) Response of pulp
sensibility test is strongly in uenced by periodontal attach-
ment loss and gingival recession. J Endod 38:580–3.
Saeed MH, Mazhari NA, Al-Rawi NH. (2011) The ef cacy of
thermal and electrical tests to register pulp vitality. J Int Dent
Med Res 4:117–22.
Samuel SS, Thomas AM, Singh N. A (2014) Comparative study
of pulse oximetry with the conventional pulp testing meth-
ods to assess vitality in immature and mature permanent
maxillary incisors Journal of Health and Research 1(4): 235-
240.
Setzer FC, Kataoka SH, Natrielli F. (2012) Clinical diagnosis of
pulp in ammation based on pulp oxygenation rates measured
by pulse oximetry. J Endod 38: 880–3.
Villa-Chavez C E., Patino-Marın N, Loyola-Rodrıguez JP, Zav-
ala-Alonso NV, Martınez-Castanon GA, Medina Solıs CE.(2013)
Predictive values of thermal and electrical dental pulp tests: A
clinical study. J Endod 39:965–969.
Weisleder R, Yamauchi S, Caplan DJ, Trope M, Teixeira FB
(2009) The validity of pulp testing: a clinical study. Journal of
the American Dental Association 140, 1013-7.
Yu C, Abbott PV. (2007)An overview of the dental pulp: Its
functions and responses to injury. Aust Dent J 52:S4-16.
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS EVALUATION OF PULPAL VITALITY TESTS ACCURACY IN DIFFERENT GROUPS OF TEETH 183