Anita Rawat et al.
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS HIGHLY SENSITIVE GOLD NANOPARTICLE BASED ELECTROCHEMICAL BIOSENSOR 89
membrane was modi ed successfully due to a reduction
in pore size resulting in increased membrane thickness.
This increase between each modi cation step was found
to be greater in the case of 30 nm membrane. BSA layer
immobilized on the membrane might have acted as inert
blocking layer hindering the diffusion of ions across the
membrane and thus resulting in increased impedance
(Huang et al., 2010).
For signal ampli cation, antigen-functionalized
AuNPs (size ~15 nm, modi ed with a carboxy-terminated
thiol and covalently coupled to the antibody through an
amide bond) were utilized. The antigen-functionalized
AuNPs bind to the corresponding antibody speci cally
which are already captured on the membrane surface.
This step decreases the pore size of the surface of the
membrane and leads to a further decrease in current
ow. This additional decrease in pore size of the mem-
brane due to AuNP coupled antigen results in signal
ampli cation almost ten times than without AuNP.
The results obtained are summarized in the form of
following bar graphs given below showing the compari-
son of the change in impedance during antigen-anti-
body interactions of all the three membranes viz. 30 nm,
50 nm and 100 nm.
Comparison of impedance produced by antigen-anti-
body interaction on gold coated polycarbonate mem-
brane of different pore size shows that with the increase
in pore size the impedance increases as shown in Figure
7. This observation could be due to partial blocking of
larger pores of the membrane on protein immobilization
which cannot inhibit ion movement across the mem-
brane ef ciently as compared to the lower pore sized
membrane.
From the Fi gure 8, it is depicted that during non-
speci c antigen and antibody interaction, the imped-
ance decreases due to improper attachment as antibody
lacks the binding site for non-speci c antigen. On the
other hand, the higher value of impedance obtained in
the case of speci c antigen-antibody interaction.
REFERENCES
Azzazy, H., M., and Mansour, M., M. (2009). In Vitro diagnostic
prospects of nanoparticles. Clin Chim Acta.403: 1-8.
Braiek, M., Rokbani, K. B., Chrouda, A., Mrabet, B., Bakhrouf,
A., Maaref, A. andJaffrezic-Renault, N.. (2012). An Electro-
chemical Immunosensor for Detection of Staphylococcus
aureus Bacteria Based on Immobilization of Antibodies on
Self-Assembled Monolayers-Functionalized Gold Electrode.
Biosensors. 2: 417-426.
Cao, X., Ye, Y. and Liu, S. (2011). Gold nanoparticle-based sig-
nal ampli cation for biosensing. Anal Biochem. 417(1): 1-16.
Chen, X., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Yan, W., Li, X. and Zhu, J. J. 2008.
Electrochemical impedance immunosensor based on three-
dimensionally ordered macroporous gold lm. Anal. Chem.
80: 2133-2140.
Clark, L. C. (1962). Electrode system for continuous monitoring
in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 148:133–153.
Crespilho, F., N., Lima, F., C., A. and da Silva, A., B., F. (2009).
The origin of the molecular interaction between amino acids
and gold nanoparticles: A theoretical and experimental inves-
tigation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 469: 186–190.
Grieshaber, D., MacKenzie, R., Voros, J., and Reimhult,E.
(2008). Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and
Architectures. Sensors. 8: 1400-1458.
Guo, S. and Dong, S. 2009. Biomolecule-nanoparticle hybrids
for electrochemical biosensors. Trends Anal Chem. 28:
96-109.
Haes, A., J., Hall, W., P., and Chang, L. (2004). A localized sur-
face plasmon resonance biosensor: rst steps toward an assay
for Alzheimer’s disease. Nano Lett. 4: 1029-1034.
Huang, J., Yang, G., Meng, W., Wu, L., Zhu, A. and Jiao,
X.. (2010). An electrochemical impedimetricimmunosensor
for label-free detection of Campylobacter Jeju Nii diarrhea
patients’ stool based on O-carboxymethylchitosan surface
modi ed Fe
3
O
4
nanoparticles. Biosensors and Bioelectronics.
25: 1204–1211.
Kleo, K., Schafer, D., Klar, S., Jacob, D., Grunow, R. and Lisdat,
F. (2012). Immunodetection of inactivated Francisellatularensis
bacteria by using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipa-
tion monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem. 404: 843-851.
Kong, J., and Yu, S. 2007. Fourier transform infrared spectro-
scopic analysis of protein secondary structures. ActaBiochimi-
caetBiophysicaSinica. 39(8): 549–559.
Li, D., Song, S., P., and Fan, C., H. (2010). Target-responsive
structural switching for nucleic acid-based sensors. AccChem
Res. 43: 631-641.
Lin, A., Son, D. H., Ahn, I. H., Song, G. H. and Han, W. T. (2007).
Visible to infrared photoluminescence from gold nanoparticles
embedded in germano-silicate glass ber. Opt Express. 15:
6374-6379.
Lin, J., H. andJu, H., X. (2005). Electrochemical and chemilu-
minescent immunosensors for tumor markers. Biosens. Bioel-
ectron., 20(8): 1461-1470.
Nykypanchuk, D., Maye, M., M., and Van der Lelie, D. 2008.
DNA-guided crystallization of colloidal nanoparticles. Nature.
451: 549–552.
Omidfar, K., Khorsand, F. and Azizi, M. D. (2013). New analyti-
cal applications of gold nanoparticles as the label in antibody-
based sensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 43: 336-347.
Pengo, P., Baltzer, L., andPasquato, L. (2007). Substrate modu-
lation of the activity of an arti cial nano esterase made of
peptide-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int
Ed. 46: 400-406.
Shen, X., C., Yuan, Q, and Liang, H. (2003). Hysteresis effects
of the interaction between serum albumins and silver nanopar-
ticles. Sci China. 46: 387-398.