![](bg6.png)
Moradpoor, Raissi and Bardideh
24 RECONSTRUCTING ROOT TREATED TEETH USING POST AND CORE – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
the highest rate of failure in all aspects. According to
(Cohort+RCT) studies, cast metal posts has the lowest
failure rate regarding post fracture, and ber posts had
the lowest root fracture and lowest total failure. Rate
of stuck loss and failure due to endodontic, periodon-
tics and dental caries problems, rate of clinical failure
of ber posts and metal cast were equal. Prefabricated
metal posts had the highest rate of failure in all aspects.
REFERENCES
Belle amme, M.M., Geerts, S.O., Louwette, M.M., Grenade, C.F.,
Vanheusden, A.J. and Mainjot, A.K., 2017. No post-no core
approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to
10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases.
Journal of Dentistry.
Bolla, M., Muller‐Bolla, M., Borg, C., Lupi‐Pegurier, L.,
Laplanche, O. and Leforestier, E., 2007. Root canal posts for the
restoration of root lled teeth. The Cochrane Library.
Borths, M.R. and Seiffert, E.R., 2017. Craniodental and humeral
morphology of a new species of Masrasector (Teratodontinae,
Hyaenodonta, Placentalia) from the late Eocene of Egypt
and locomotor diversity in hyaenodonts. PloS one, 12(4),
p.e0173527.
Choudhary, S., Begum, Z., Choudhary, P. and Tripathi, S., 2014.
Comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and con-
ventional cast post: An in vitro study. Journal of International
Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 4(2), p.87.
Duret, B., Reynaud, M. and Duret, F., 1990. New concept of
coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1). Le Chir-
urgien-Dentiste de France, 60(540), pp.131-41.
Dua, N., Kumar, B., Arunagiri, D., Iqbal, M., Pushpa, S. and
Hussain, J., 2016. Comparative evaluation of the effect of dif-
ferent crown ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endo-
dontically treated mandibular premolars restored with ber
posts, composite cores, and crowns: An ex-vivo study. Journal
of conservative dentistry: JCD, 19(3), p.264.
Figueiredo, F.E.D., Martins-Filho, P.R.S. and Faria-e-Silva,
A.L., 2015. Do metal post–retained restorations result in more
root fractures than ber post–retained restorations? A system-
atic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endodontics, 41(3),
pp.309-316.
Ferrari, M., Grandini, S., Simonetti, M., Monticelli, F. and
Goracci, C., 2002. In uence of a microbrush on bonding ber
post into root canals under clinical conditions. Oral Surgery,
Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodon-
tology, 94(5), pp.627-631.
Fernandes, A.S. and Dessai, G.S., 2001. Factors affecting the
fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review.
International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14(4).
Fernandes, A.S., Shetty, S. and Coutinho, I., 2003. Factors
determining post selection: a literature review. The Journal of
prosthetic dentistry, 90(6), pp.556-562.
Goodacre, C.J. and Spolnik, K.J., 1994. The prosthodontic man-
agement of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review.
Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. Journal of
Prosthodontics, 3(4), pp.243-250.
Heydecke, G. and Peters, M.C., 2002. The restoration of endo-
dontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts
and cores: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic den-
tistry, 87(4), pp.380-386.
Hongxue, M., Lili, S., Kun, L. and Linwang, S., 2013. Clinical
evaluation of residual crowns and roots restored by glass ber
post and core, cast metal post and core or directly. West China
Journal of Stomatology, 31(1).
Leprince, J.G., Leloup, G. and Hardy, C.M., 2017. Considera-
tions for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Molars. In
The Guidebook to Molar Endodontics (pp. 169-205). Springer
Berlin Heidelberg.
Meyenberg, K.H., LÜTHY, H. and SCHÄRER, P., 1995. Zirco-
nia Posts: A New All‐Ceramic Concept for Nonvital Abut-
ment Teeth. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 7(2),
pp.73-80.
Morgano, S.M., Hashem, A.F., Fotoohi, K. and Rose, L., 1994.
A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and tech-
niques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. The Journal of
prosthetic dentistry, 72(3), pp.259-267.
Morgano, S.M. and Milot, P., 1993. Clinical success of cast
metal posts and cores. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
70(1), pp.11-16.
Pétercsák, A., Radics, T. and Hegedus, C., 2014. Advantages
and disadvantages of applying yttrium stabilized zirconium-
dioxide post and core restorations. Fogorvosi szemle, 107(1),
pp.9-13.
Rightmire, G.P., de León, M.S.P., Lordkipanidze, D., Margve-
lashvili, A. and Zollikofer, C.P., 2017. Skull 5 from Dmanisi:
descriptive anatomy, comparative studies, and evolutionary
signi cance. Journal of Human Evolution, 104, pp.50-79.
Rocha, A.T., Gonçalves, L.M., de Carvalho Vasconcelos, A.J.,
Maia Filho, E.M., Carvalho, C.N., Tavarez, R.R.D.J., No, R.J.M.
and São Luis, R.I., Effect of anatomical customization of the
ber post on the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement.
Singh, S.V., Bhat, M., Gupta, S., Sharma, D., Satija, H. and
Sharma, S., 2015. Stress distribution of endodontically treated
teeth with titanium alloy post and carbon ber post with dif-
ferent alveolar bone height: A three-dimensional nite ele-
ment analysis. European journal of dentistry, 9(3), p.428.
Smith, C.T. and Schuman, N., 1998. Prefabricated post-and-
core systems: an overview. Compendium of continuing educa-
tion in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995), 19(10), pp.1013-8.
Terry, D.A. and Swift, E.J., 2010. Post and Cores: Past to Pre-
sent. Dentistry today, 29(1), pp.132-134.
Zalkind, M., Shkury, S., Stern, N. and Heling, I., 2000. Effect
of prefabricated metal post‐head design on the retention of
various core materials. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 27(6),
pp.483-487.
Zhou, L. and Wang, Q., 2013. Comparison of fracture resistance
between cast posts and ber posts: a meta-analysis of litera-
ture. Journal of endodontics, 39(1), pp.11-15.