
Saima Salim
they are doubtful about their future and the sustainabil-
ity of what this  eld has to offer in their home country. 
Scholarships and stipends are very attractive in western 
countries strongly suggesting that those at the helm of 
affairs dosome introspection on why we have failed to 
build world class institutes. Many students at state uni-
versities are receiving a substandard education (Padma, 
2015). “Here, there are no good science teachers, no good 
Indian textbooks, and most of the science laboratories 
are poorly equipped. The lack of interest and passion 
of research is losing its charm and is surely re ected. 
“We are caught in a vicious circle of mediocrity,” says 
geneticist Deepak Pental, former vice-chancellor of the 
University of Delhi (Padma, 2015).
There is over-bureaucratization and lobbying within 
the universities and their controlling bodies” (Pusaria, 
2015). The process of fresh recruitment is bizarrely 
lengthy, and it takes two years to recruit an academic 
after announcing an open post, which means that 
the best applicants can slip away. “Lack of even bare, 
minimal and sustainable funds for teaching, let alone 
research, has seriously plagued the quality and standards 
of science education,” says Krishna Ganesh, a chemist 
and director of the Indian Institute of Science Education 
and Research in Pune, one of  ve top universities set up 
in India since 2006. And to add the regulations govern-
ing the formation,  nancing and functioning of these 
organizations are murkier than what is believed.
Council of Scienti c and Industrial Research(CSIR), 
an autonomous body and the largest research and devel-
opment (R&D) organization in India. It runs 37 labora-
tories and 39  eld stations or extension centers spread 
across the nation, with a collective staff of over 17000 
(source; Wikipedia). The governmental stance has begun 
to affect some elite national research institutes, too. Of 
the 38 national laboratories that are part of the CSIR, 
only 25 have full-time directors. The rest are making do 
with acting directors, or temporary arrangements.
Even the CSIR headquarters in New Delhi has been 
without a full-time leader since January 2014. Interim 
director-general Madhukar Garg says that “the current 
situation is indeed challenging (Sharma, 2015). CSIR is 
the backbone of scienti c and technological research in 
the country. In case the prevailing scenario continues, it 
will affect the national innovation system as a whole.” 
(Sharma, 2015). The current budgets of almost all sci-
enti c departments have either been slashed or are just 
stagnating. Furthermore, the practice of temporary or 
adhoc recruitment in governance of scienti c  institu-
tions is adding up to build distort. (Sharma, 2015).
The major chunk of research is still being conducted 
in academic institutes that are being run by the govern-
ment funded projects. This dependence on government 
money has been one of the leading causes to diminish the 
overall ambience of the scienti c community in India. 
Sadly, the scientists and academicians have a pessimistic 
sentiment about their inventions as the patents received 
throughgovernmentsupported schemes andfellowships 
are sold to private companies for huge sums and the 
other major industrial players don’t support any R&D 
activity other than for their in- house projects. In west-
ern countries, it is vice versa. Private companies provide 
the huge share of funding for research.
With this prevailing sentiment amongst the scienti c 
youth it is likely that the trend of brain drain will con-
tinue to rise unless a major change happens to halt this 
ef ux. On a  ip side, there are some signs that India 
might be slowing its crippling brain drain, however the 
chances are bleak. Although the vast majority of Indi-
ans who obtain science doctorates in the United States 
remain there for at least 5 years after graduation, the 
proportion has declined: from 89% in 2001 to 82% in 
2011, the most recent year for which data are available 
(Mervis, 2014). There are many who return back to their 
home lands. Kaustuv Datta, a geneticist at Delhi Univer-
sity South Campus, is one of those who returned. “My 
parents are here, in India. And academics have a strong, 
positive in uence on the next generation of students,” 
says Datta. “I wanted to make that contribution in India” 
(Padma, 2015). 
The phrase ‘Knowledge is Power’ might have orig-
inated with in the 16th century and it’s as old as 
time. Today as we stay, we need to have a concerted 
progress and clarity of goals. India’s educational system 
fails to instill into young Indians a dynamic awareness 
and understanding of their country’s achievements. In 
present scenario, our crumbling educational and research 
framework requires serious uphauling, from successive 
increase in plan allocations for scienti c departments, to 
setting up of new institutions for science education and 
research, creation of centers of excellence and facili-
ties in emerging and frontline areas in academic and 
national institutes, induction of new and attractive fel-
lowships and strengthening R&D infrastructure in uni-
versities. Turning brain drain into brain gain requires 
creation of appropriate opportunities at certain critical 
stages in the progression of a scienti c career. 
On the contrary the picture in the west, especially 
US is not rosy either. The pattern reaching back over 
the years demonstrate how the US scienti c produce has 
reached a stand point- a state of saturation with fewer 
jobs, more unemployment, and more post-doc work - 
especially in the sciences. A post doc essentially trans-
lates into toiling as a low-paid lab hand. In short, job 
prospects for young science Ph.Ds haven’t been look-
ing so hot these last few years, not only in the life sci-
ences, which have been weak for some time, but also in 
 elds like engineering (Powell, 2012). So, its high time, 
578  INDIA: IN PURSUIT OF SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE IN THE PRESENT SCENARIO!  BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS